Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34408340›Full record

ReviewJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2021

Thickened Endometrium: When to Intervene? A Clinical Conundrum.

S K Giri, B L Nayak, Janmejay Mohapatra

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S K GiriDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, A.H.PGIC, Cuttack, 753007 India.
B L NayakDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, A.H.PGIC, Cuttack, 753007 India.
Janmejay MohapatraDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, A.H.PGIC, Cuttack, 753007 India.
Sriram Chandra Bhanja Medical College Hospital · INSri Sri University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The endometrium is a dynamic target organ in a woman's reproductive life. It undergoes cyclical change regulated by the fine balance between oestrogen and progesterone. The endometrial thickness (ET) varies according to the phases of the menstrual cycle. Endometrium contains both oestrogen and progesterone receptors, which respond to above hormones, irrespective of whether the woman is in reproductive or menopausal phase. Abundance of oestrogen leads to endometrial hyperplasia, and paucity causes endometrial atrophy. The initial best modality of assessing ET or aberration is high resolution transvaginal ultrasonogram. Thickened endometrium is always a clinical conundrum. Dilemma does remain as to the thickness of endometrium which requires intervention, mostly in symptomatic pre and perimenopausal women. In post-menopausal women with bleeding, the cut-off of ET that warrants investigation is almost defined. However, the cut-off value of ET in asymptomatic postmenopausal women; beyond which intervention is required, is still debated. Dilemma also exists about the cut-off of ET in both symptomatic and asymptomatic women on HRT and Tamoxifen. This article will discuss the above issues and reach at some consensus about the cut-off of ET after critical analysis of evidence and experience and will help clinicians in arriving at a proper decision in dealing with such clinically confounding situations.

Indexed as

AUBEndometrial thicknessInterventionPerimenopause/menopauseTVS

Identifiers

PMID34408340
PMCPMC8310815
OpenAlexW3129130301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.