Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34408318›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2021

Opportunities and challenges of macrogenetic studies.

Deborah M Leigh, Charles B van Rees, Katie L Millette, Martin F Breed, Chloé Schmidt, Laura D Bertola, Brian K Hand, Margaret E Hunter, Evelyn L Jensen, Francine Kershaw and 8 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Biodiversity conservation requires integration of species-centric and process-based strategies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Deborah M Leigh *Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3902-2568
Charles B van Rees *Flathead Lake Biological Station, Polson, MT, USA.
Katie L Millette *Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9638-1538
Martin F BreedCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7810-9696
Chloé SchmidtDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2572-4200
Laura D BertolaCity College of New York, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3445-0355
Brian K HandFlathead Lake Biological Station, Polson, MT, USA.
Margaret E HunterU.S. Geological Survey, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Evelyn L JensenSchool of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1819-3117
Francine KershawNatural Resources Defense Council, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2146-8094
Libby LigginsSchool of Natural and Computational Sciences, Massey University Auckland, Auckland, Aotearoa, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-1143-2346
Gordon LuikartFlathead Lake Biological Station, Polson, MT, USA.
Stéphanie ManelCEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE-PSL University, IRD, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8902-6052
Joachim MergeayResearch Institute for Nature and Forest, Geraardsbergen, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6504-0551
Joshua M MillerDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4019-7675
Gernot SegelbacherChair of Wildlife Ecology and Management, University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8024-7008
Sean HobanCenter for Tree Science, The Morton Arboretum, Lisle, USA. shoban@mortonarb.org.ORCID 0000-0002-0348-8449
Ivan Paz-VinasLaboratoire Evolution & Diversité Biologique, Université de Toulouse, Centre National pour la Recherche Scientifique, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, UMR5174 EDB, Toulouse, Toulouse, France. ivanpaz23@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0043-9289

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapidly emerging field of macrogenetics focuses on analysing publicly accessible genetic datasets from thousands of species to explore large-scale patterns and predictors of intraspecific genetic variation. Facilitated by advances in evolutionary biology, technology, data infrastructure, statistics and open science, macrogenetics addresses core evolutionary hypotheses (such as disentangling environmental and life-history effects on genetic variation) with a global focus. Yet, there are important, often overlooked, limitations to this approach and best practices need to be considered and adopted if macrogenetics is to continue its exciting trajectory and reach its full potential in fields such as biodiversity monitoring and conservation. Here, we review the history of this rapidly growing field, highlight knowledge gaps and future directions, and provide guidelines for further research.

Indexed as

GeneticsGenetic VariationAnimalsBiodiversityDatabases, GeneticGenetics, PopulationGenetic TechniquesHumansPhylogeographyWorkflow

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.