Trial reportScientific reports2021
Improvement of quality of life and symptom burden after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with moderate to severe LUTS.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Lower urinary tract symptoms after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Baseline factors and surgical procedures affecting changes in lower urinary tract symptoms after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: the impact of nerve-sparing.International urology and nephrology · 2024Article
- Can men 75 and older safely receive a minimally invasive radical prostatectomy?Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Article
- Vesicoprostatic muscle reconstruction: a step further for immediate and early urinary continence.World journal of urology · 2023Article
- Two-year quality of life after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy according to pentafecta criteria and cancer of the prostate risk assessment (CAPRA-S).Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess clinically meaningful differences of preoperative lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and quality of life (QoL) before and after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Therefore we identified 5506 RARP patients from 2007 to 2018 with completed International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and -QoL questionnaires before and 12 months after RARP in our institution. Marked clinically important difference (MCID) was defined by using the strictest IPSS-difference of - 8 points. Multivariable logistic regression analyses (LRM) aimed to predict ∆IPSS ≤ - 8 and were restricted to RARP patients with preoperatively moderate (IPSS 8-19) vs. severe (IPSS 20-35) LUTS burden (n = 2305). Preoperative LUTS was categorized as moderate and severe in 37% (n = 2014) and 5.3% of the complete cohort (n = 291), respectively. Here, a postoperative ∆IPSS ≤ - 8, was reported in 38% vs. 90%. In LRM, younger age (OR 0.98, 95%CI 0.97-0.99; p = 0.007), lower BMI (OR 0.94, 95%CI 0.92-0.97; p < 0.001), higher preoperative LUTS burden (severe vs. moderate [REF.] OR 15.6, 95%CI 10.4-23.4; p < 0.001), greater prostate specimen weight (per 10 g, OR 1.12, 95%CI 1.07-1.16; p < 0.001) and the event of urinary continence recovery (OR 1.66 95%CI 1.25-2.21; p < 0.001) were independent predictors of a marked LUTS improvement after RARP. Less rigorous IPSS-difference of - 5 points yielded identical predictors. To sum up, in substantial proportions of patients with preoperative moderate or severe LUTS a marked improvement of LUTS and QoL can be expected at 12 months after RARP. LRM revealed greatest benefit in those patients with preoperatively greatest LUTS burden, prostate enlargement, lower BMI, younger age and the event of urinary continence recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.