Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34408174›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2021

Characterization and clinical implications of ankle impedance during walking in chronic stroke.

Amanda L Shorter, James K Richardson, Suzanne B Finucane, Varun Joshi, Keith Gordon, Elliott J Rouse

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06109194 (Immediate Effect of Ankle Mobilization on Active Range of Motion and Gait in Subacute Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06109194 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Immediate Effect of Ankle Mobilization on Active Range of Motion and Gait in Subacute Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorLoma Linda UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled20ConditionsHemiparesis, Poststroke/CVAArmsJoint mobilization
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amanda L ShorterDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, McCormick School of Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
James K RichardsonDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Suzanne B FinucaneThe Center for Bionic Medicine, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, USA.
Varun JoshiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Keith GordonDepartment of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Elliott J RouseDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. ejrouse@umich.edu.

Funding

Quantification of dynamic ankle mechanics for assessment and treatment of locomotor dysfunction post strokeR21HD097663 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ROUSE, ELLIOTT J · 2019 to 2020
$401k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD097663
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals post-stroke experience persisting gait deficits due to altered joint mechanics, known clinically as spasticity, hypertonia, and paresis. In engineering, these concepts are described as stiffness and damping, or collectively as joint mechanical impedance, when considered with limb inertia. Typical clinical assessments of these properties are obtained while the patient is at rest using qualitative measures, and the link between the assessments and functional outcomes and mobility is unclear. In this study we quantify ankle mechanical impedance dynamically during walking in individuals post-stroke and in age-speed matched control subjects, and examine the relationships between mechanical impedance and clinical measures of mobility and impairment. Perturbations were applied to the ankle joint during the stance phase of walking, and least-squares system identification techniques were used to estimate mechanical impedance. Stiffness of the paretic ankle was decreased during mid-stance when compared to the non-paretic side; a change independent of muscle activity. Inter-limb differences in ankle joint damping, but not joint stiffness or passive clinical assessments, strongly predicted walking speed and distance. This work provides the first insights into how stroke alters joint mechanical impedance during walking, as well as how these changes relate to existing outcome measures. Our results inform clinical care, suggesting a focus on correcting stance phase mechanics could potentially improve mobility of chronic stroke survivors.

Indexed as

GaitWalkingWalking SpeedAdultAnkleAnkle JointBiomechanical PhenomenaChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedStroke

Identifiers

PMID34408174
PMCPMC8373915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.