ReviewNPJ genomic medicine2021
Queensland Genomics: an adaptive approach for integrating genomics into a public healthcare system.
Review in NPJ genomic medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- A consensus model for implementation of genomics in Queensland Health - a Delphi study.Human genomics · 2026Article
- Exploratory Cost-Utility Analysis of a 37-Gene Panel Versus Usual Care to Guide Therapy for Patients with Intermediate-Risk Myeloid Malignancies.Applied health economics and health policy · 2025Article
- Implementation and Evaluation of a National Multidisciplinary Kidney Genetics Clinic Network Over 10 Years.Kidney international reports · 2024Article
- Using Genomics To Investigate an Outbreak of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium ST78 at a Large Tertiary Hospital in Queensland.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Australian Genomics: Outcomes of a 5-year national program to accelerate the integration of genomics in healthcare.American journal of human genetics · 2023Review
- The implementation of large-scale genomic screening or diagnostic programmes: A rapid evidence review.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2023Review
- Culture intelligent workflow, structure, and steps.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2023Review
- Evolution of virtual gene panels over time and implications for genomic data re-analysis.Genetics in medicine open · 2023Article
- Developing CIRdb as a catalog of natural genetic variation in the Canary Islanders.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Phylodynamic Inference of Bacterial Outbreak Parameters Using Nanopore Sequencing.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Community input in a genomic health implementation program: Perspectives of a community advisory group.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Evaluation of a Genetics Education Program for Health Interpreters: A Pilot Study.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Patient-Derived Explants as a Precision Medicine Patient-Proximal Testing Platform Informing Cancer Management.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The establishment of genomics in health care systems has been occurring for the past decade. It is recognised that implementing genomics within a health service is challenging without a system-wide approach. Globally, as clinical genomics implementation programs have matured there is a growing body of information around program design and outcomes. Program structures vary depending on local ecosystems including the health system, politics and funding availability, however, lessons from other programs are important to the design of programs in different jurisdictions. Here we describe an adaptive approach to the implementation of genomics into a publicly funded health care system servicing a population of 5.1 million people. The adaptive approach enabled flexibility to facilitate substantial changes during the program in response to learnings and external factors. We report the benefits and challenges experienced by the program, particularly in relation to the engagement of people and services, and the design of both individual projects and the program as a whole.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.