Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34408103›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of reproduction and development2021

Supplementing media with NAD

Charley-Lea Pollard, Zamira Gibb, Azelle Hawdon, Aleona Swegen, Christopher G Grupen

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of reproduction and development, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. NADAging and disease · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. A Molecular Perspective and Role of NADInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Can Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide (NADAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. NADThe Journal of reproduction and development · 2022
    Review
  13. Insights into the NADThe Journal of reproduction and development · 2022
    Article
  14. Supplemental Nicotinic Acid Elevates NADAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Charley-Lea PollardSydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, NSW 2570, Australia.
Zamira GibbPriority Research Centre for Reproductive Science, University of Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia.
Azelle HawdonSydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, NSW 2570, Australia.
Aleona SwegenPriority Research Centre for Reproductive Science, University of Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia.
Christopher G GrupenSydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, NSW 2570, Australia.
University of Newcastle Australia · AUUniversity of Sydney · AUAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vitro maturation (IVM) is an important reproductive technology used to produce embryos in vitro. However, the developmental potential of oocytes sourced for IVM is markedly lower than those matured in vivo. Previously, NAD

Indexed as

In Vitro Oocyte Maturation TechniquesAnimalsCulture MediaEmbryonic DevelopmentNADNiacinNicotinamide MononucleotideSwineCulture MediaNADNiacinNicotinamide Mononucleotidenicotinate mononucleotidenicotinic acid adenine dinucleotideEmbryo developmentIn vitro maturationNiacinOocyte qualityPig

Identifiers

PMID34408103
PMCPMC8568614
OpenAlexW3195447738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.