Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34408039›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

How culture affects validity: understanding Japanese residents' sense-making of evaluating clinical teachers.

Makoto Kikukawa, Renée Stalmeijer, Takahiro Matsuguchi, Miyako Oike, Emura Sei, Lambert W T Schuwirth, Albert J J A Scherpbier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Makoto KikukawaDepartment of Medical Education, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan kikukawa.makoto.892@m.kyushu-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-7903-6430
Renée StalmeijerDepartment of Educational Development and Research, Maastricht University Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Takahiro MatsuguchiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kitakyushu Minicipal Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Miyako OikeDepartment of Nursing, Fukuoka International University of Health and Welfare, Fukuoka, Japan.
Emura SeiSaga Medical Career Support Center, Saga University Hospital, Saga, Japan.
Lambert W T SchuwirthDepartment of Educational Development and Research, Maastricht University Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Albert J J A ScherpbierInstitute for Medical Education, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLFlinders University · AUFukuoka International University · JPKitakyushu Municipal Medical Center · JPKyushu University · JPSaga University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTraditionally, evaluation is considered a measurement process that can be performed independently of the cultural context. However, more recently the importance of considering raters' sense-making, that is, the process by which raters assign meaning to their collective experiences, is being recognised. Thus far, the majority of the discussion on this topic has originated from Western perspectives. Little is known about the potential influence of an Asian culture on raters' sense-making. This study explored residents' sense-making associated with evaluating their clinical teachers within an Asian setting to better understand contextual dependency of validity.

designA qualitative study using constructivist grounded theory.

settingThe Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare has implemented a system to monitor the quality of clinical teaching within its 2-year postgraduate training programme. An evaluation instrument was developed specifically for the Japanese setting through which residents can evaluate their clinical teachers.

participants30 residents from 10 Japanese teaching hospitals with experience in evaluating their clinical teachers were sampled purposively and theoretically.

methodsWe conducted in-depth semistructured individual interviews. Sensitising concepts derived from Confucianism and principles of response process informed open, axial and selective coding.

resultsTwo themes and four subthemes were constructed. Japanese residents emphasised the awareness of their relationship with their clinical teachers (1). This awareness was fuelled by their sense of hierarchy (1a) and being part of the collective society (1b). Residents described how the meaning of evaluation (2) was coloured by their perceived role as senior (2a) and their experienced responsibility for future generations (2b).

conclusionsJapanese residents' sense-making while evaluating their clinical teachers appears to be situated and affected by Japanese cultural values. These findings contribute to a better understanding of a culture's influence on residents' sense-making of evaluation instruments and the validity argument of evaluation.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyGrounded TheoryHumansJapanQualitative Researchhuman resource managementmedical education & trainingquality in healthcare

Identifiers

PMID34408039
PMCPMC8375773
OpenAlexW3194713212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.