Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34408026›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2021

Perspectives on the current state of Nigeria's emergency care system among participants of an emergency medicine symposium: a qualitative appraisal.

Agnes Usoro, Benjamin Aiwonodagbon, Jonathan Strong, Sean Kivlehan, Babatunde A Akodu, Ayobami Olufadeji

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Assessment of emergency care services in Nigerian hospitals: A cross-sectional study.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Barriers and facilitators to providing facility-based emergency care in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A mixed methods study.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Out of hospital emergency care in Nigeria: A narrative review.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Agnes UsoroDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA ausoro1@jhmi.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0010-0277
Benjamin AiwonodagbonDepartment of Communicable and Non-Communicable Disease (CND) Cluster of the Country Office, World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Abuja, Federal Capital Territory, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-1717-8206
Jonathan StrongDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6299-8297
Sean KivlehanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4857-4316
Babatunde A AkoduDepartment of Family Medicine, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Idi-Araba, Lagos, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-0989-3568
Ayobami OlufadejiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4891-7291

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEmergency care systems provide timely and relevant care to the acutely ill and injured. Published commentaries have characterised deficiencies in the Nigerian emergency care system and offered potential solutions but have not included the perspectives of the Nigerian public. A more inclusive approach that includes feedback from the public may help improve the Nigerian emergency care system through better understanding of the needs, values and expectations of the community.

methodsParticipants of an emergency medicine symposium participated in focus group discussions that were randomly divided into small groups led by two trained facilitators. These facilitators asked open-ended, semistructured questions to lead discussions in the English language. Participant responses were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim into transcripts. Two independent investigators employed conventional content analysis to code the transcripts until thematic saturation was achieved.

resultsThree descriptive themes emerged characterising the current state of Nigeria's emergency care system as it relates to prehospital care delivery, hospital care delivery and health system governance: rudimentary, vulnerable and disconnected. At the prehospital level, concepts revolved around emergency recognition and response, ambulance and frontline providers, and cultural norms. At the hospital level, concepts centred around the health workforce, clinical competency, hospital capacity and the burden of financial hardship. At the health system level, concepts concentrated on healthcare access and healthcare financing. Opportunities for emergency care system improvement at each component level were identified and explored.

conclusionsThe participants in this study identified shortcomings and opportunities to improve prehospital care, hospital care and health system governance. The results of this study may help healthcare professionals, policy makers and community leaders identify gaps in the emergency care system and offer solutions in harmony with the needs, values and expectations of the community. If successful, these community-informed interventions may serve as a model to improve emergency care systems throughout Africa.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesEmergency MedicineHealth Services AccessibilityHumansNigeriaQualitative Researchaccident & emergency medicinepublic healthqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID34408026
PMCPMC8375725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.