Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34407867›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2021

Estimating the impact of Tiny Targets in reducing the incidence of Gambian sleeping sickness in the North-west Uganda focus.

Paul R Bessell, Johan Esterhuizen, Michael J Lehane, Joshua Longbottom, Albert Mugenyi, Richard Selby, Inaki Tirados, Steve J Torr, Charles Waiswa, Charles Wamboga and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Paul R BessellIndependent Consultant, Pencaitland, Scotland, UK. prbessell@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7901-969X
Johan EsterhuizenLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM), Pembroke Place, Liverpool, UK.
Michael J LehaneLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM), Pembroke Place, Liverpool, UK.
Joshua LongbottomLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM), Pembroke Place, Liverpool, UK.
Albert MugenyiCoordinating Office for Control of Trypanosomiasis in Uganda (COCTU), Kampala, Uganda.
Richard SelbyLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM), Pembroke Place, Liverpool, UK.
Inaki TiradosLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM), Pembroke Place, Liverpool, UK.
Steve J TorrLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM), Pembroke Place, Liverpool, UK.
Charles WaiswaCoordinating Office for Control of Trypanosomiasis in Uganda (COCTU), Kampala, Uganda.
Charles WambogaMinistry of Health (MOH), Kampala, Uganda.
Andrew HopeLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM), Pembroke Place, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRiverine species of tsetse (Glossina) transmit Trypanosoma brucei gambiense, which causes Gambian human African trypanosomiasis (gHAT), a neglected tropical disease. Uganda aims to eliminate gHAT as a public health problem through detection and treatment of human cases and vector control. The latter is being achieved through the deployment of 'Tiny Targets', insecticide-impregnated panels of material which attract and kill tsetse. We analysed the spatial and temporal distribution of cases of gHAT in Uganda during the period 2010-2019 to assess whether Tiny Targets have had an impact on disease incidence.

methodsTo quantify the deployment of Tiny Targets, we mapped the rivers and their associated watersheds in the intervention area. We then categorised each of these on a scale of 0-3 according to whether Tiny Targets were absent (0), present only in neighbouring watersheds (1), present in the watersheds but not all neighbours (2), or present in the watershed and all neighbours (3). We overlaid all cases that were diagnosed between 2000 and 2020 and assessed whether the probability of finding cases in a watershed changed following the deployment of targets. We also estimated the number of cases averted through tsetse control.

resultsWe found that following the deployment of Tiny Targets in a watershed, there were fewer cases of HAT, with a sampled error probability of 0.007. We estimate that during the intervention period 2012-2019 we should have expected 48 cases (95% confidence intervals = 40-57) compared to the 36 cases observed. The results are robust to a range of sensitivity analyses.

conclusionsTiny Targets have reduced the incidence of gHAT by 25% in north-western Uganda.

Indexed as

AnimalsGambiaHumansIncidenceInsect ControlInsecticidesInsect VectorsPublic HealthTrypanosoma brucei gambienseTrypanosomiasis, AfricanTsetse FliesUgandaInsecticidesDisease controlEliminationHuman African trypanosomiasisTiny TargetsTsetse controlUganda

Identifiers

PMID34407867
PMCPMC8371857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.