Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34407862›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2021

Enrollment, retention, and strategies for including disadvantaged populations in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review protocol.

Abigail LaPlante, Renata W Yen, Talia Isaacs, Joanna Crocker, Zsofia Demjen, Danielle Schubbe, Alice M Kennedy, Jaclyn Engel, Nancy O'Brien, Carla Richters and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Patient-centred clinical trial design.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Abigail LaPlanteThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Williamson Translational Research Building, Level 5, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Renata W YenThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Williamson Translational Research Building, Level 5, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Talia IsaacsUCL Centre for Applied Linguistics, UCL Institute of Education, University College London, 20 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AL, UK. talia.isaacs@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4302-3379
Joanna CrockerNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Woodstock Rd, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
Zsofia DemjenUCL Centre for Applied Linguistics, UCL Institute of Education, University College London, 20 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AL, UK.
Danielle SchubbeThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Williamson Translational Research Building, Level 5, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Alice M KennedyThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Williamson Translational Research Building, Level 5, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Jaclyn EngelThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Williamson Translational Research Building, Level 5, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Nancy O'BrienThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Williamson Translational Research Building, Level 5, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Carla RichtersPatient and Family Advocate, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center Office of Patient Experience, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Marie-Anne DurandThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Williamson Translational Research Building, Level 5, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany randomized controlled trials fail to reach their target sample size. When coupled with the omission and underrepresentation of disadvantaged groups in randomized controlled trials, many trials fail to obtain data that accurately represents the true diversity of their target population. Policies and practices have been implemented to increase representation of disadvantaged groups in many randomized controlled trials, with some trials specifically targeting such groups. To our knowledge, no systematic review has quantified the enrollment metrics and effectiveness of inclusion and retention strategies in randomized controlled trials focused on disadvantaged populations specifically.

methodsWe will conduct a systematic search across EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and CINAHL as well as grey literature, conference proceedings, research monographs, and Google Scholar from inception onwards. We will include randomized controlled trials where at least 50% of enrolled participants are considered to be disadvantaged, as per the RCT authors' definition and in line with our inclusion criteria. Two independent researchers per article will conduct preliminary title and abstract screening, subsequent full text review, and data extraction for the selected trials, with a third reviewer available to resolve conflicts. We will assess the quality of all included studies using specific criteria regarding data reporting, external validity, and internal validity. We will combine all selected studies and conduct a narrative synthesis to assess enrollment metrics. If there is sufficient homogeneity and sufficient trials comparing recruitment strategies within disadvantaged populations, we will conduct a random effects meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of strategies designed to maximize the inclusion of disadvantaged populations in randomized controlled trials. DISCUSSION: The findings of this systematic review will establish baseline recruitment and enrollment metrics of trials targeting disadvantaged populations to elucidate the scope of the challenge of recruiting such populations. We hope that our findings will promote future research on the distinct barriers that may prevent disadvantaged populations from participating in health intervention research, will encourage more trials exploring effective, tailored recruitment strategies, and will establish a foundation to track future progress in the recruitment of disadvantaged populations. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: PROSPERO ID: CRD42020152814.

Indexed as

Research PersonnelVulnerable PopulationsHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSystematic Reviews as TopicDisadvantaged populationsDisparitiesEnrollmentHealthHealth interventionsRandomized controlled trialsRetentionTrial recruitment

Identifiers

PMID34407862
PMCPMC8372683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.