Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34407810›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical education2021

Efficacy of pedagogical framework in neonatal resuscitation skill learning in a resource-limited setting: a randomized controlled trial.

Mishal Liaqat, Muhammad Hussain, Muhammad Afzal, Maryam Altaf, Sadia Khan, Syed Amir Gilani, Iram Liaqat

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04748341 (The Efficacy of Pedagogical Framework), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04748341 nacompletednot on this map

The Efficacy of Pedagogical Framework (Learn, See, Practice, Prove, Do, Maintain) on Knowledge, Skill, and Self-Efficacy of Nursing Students Regarding Neonatal Resuscitation.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of LahoreRan2021 to 2021Enrolled62ConditionsNursing Students Education on Neonatal ResuscitationArmsPedagogical Framework (Learn, See, Practice, Prove, Do, and Maintain), Traditional Method
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mishal LiaqatLahore School of Nursing, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan. mishee861@gmail.com.
Muhammad HussainLahore School of Nursing, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Muhammad AfzalLahore School of Nursing, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Maryam AltafFaculty of Allied Health Sciences, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Sadia KhanFaculty of Allied Health Sciences, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Syed Amir GilaniFaculty of Allied Health Sciences, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Iram LiaqatDepartment of Zoology, The Government College University, Lahore, Pakistan.
University of Lahore · PKGovernment College University, Lahore · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe educational efficacy in neonatal resuscitation relies on the subject and teaching strategies. Therefore, it is imperative to test diverse educational methods if they are more instructive to engage students in active learning and practicing knowledge. Hence, the present study aims to investigate the efficacy of a pedagogical framework in neonatal resuscitation skill learning among nursing students in a resource-limited setting.

methodsA single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted between October 2020 to March 2021. Sixty nursing students in the 3rd and 4th year of professional training were randomly allocated to the pedagogy and the traditional group. The pedagogy group learned via 6-step LSPPDM (Learn, See, Practice, Prove, Do, Maintain) pedagogy including lectures, video, clinical observation, skill sessions under supervision, and self-directed practice. The traditional group learned through 2-step (Learn, Practice) method that included lectures and skill sessions under supervision. The outcomes measured included technical and non-technical skills in neonatal resuscitation. The technical skill deals with steps such as stimulation, ventilation, oxygenation, intubation, chest compression, medications, and reporting. Non-technical skills refer to teamwork skills that focus on the interaction between leader and helper. Both skills were measured through previously published validated tools two times before and after the intervention by blinded assessors in a simulated delivery room.

resultsOverall, the skill was significantly improved in both groups after intervention. Yet, the results showed that the mean difference of technical skill score in the pedagogy group (24.3 ± 3.5) was significantly higher (p <  0.001) compared to the traditional group (16.2 ± 2.4). Likewise, the mean difference of non-technical skill score in the pedagogy (36.9 ± 1.9) was highly significant (p <  0.001) compared to the traditional group (31.2 ± 1.7).

conclusionsThe LSPPDM pedagogy was found more effective in enhancing technical and non-technical skills in neonatal resuscitation compared to the traditional method. The results of this study support the efficacy of the 6-step LSPPDM pedagogy in the education of nursing students regarding neonatal resuscitation in a resource-limited setting.

trial registrationProspectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04748341 ).

Indexed as

ResuscitationStudents, NursingClinical CompetenceHumansInfant, NewbornLearningSingle-Blind MethodEducationNeonatal resuscitationNursingPedagogySkillStudents

Identifiers

PMID34407810
PMCPMC8371841
OpenAlexW3196228793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.