ArticleBMC medical education2021
Formal evidence-based medicine instruction in Turkish undergraduate medical education: an initial evaluation.
Article in BMC medical education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spotlight on mentoring undergraduate medical students using evidence-based medicine.BMC medical education · 2026Review
- Knowledge, attitudes, and skills towards evidence-based medicine among Palestinian undergraduate medical students: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Self-perceived knowledge, attitude, and practice of evidence-based medicine before and after training among healthcare workers in Taizhou, China.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- How does evidence-based medicine training affect medical students' views on traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine and the conspiracy theories about COVID-19: a nationwide study.Primary health care research & development · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlobal and national undergraduate medical education accreditation organizations recommend the inclusion of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) instructions into the medical schools' curricula. Accordingly, some Turkish medical schools have individually developed and implemented EBM training programs, but there is no data of current programs' effectiveness and students' learning achievements due to the lack of a validated Turkish language EBM assessment tool. This study evaluates the effect of a newly introduced formal EBM instruction to the curriculum on students' knowledge and skills by using the recently published Turkish adaptation of the Fresno Test.
methodsThe study is an experimental investigation using pre- and post-test evaluations. A five-week EBM course was developed according to Kern's six-step curriculum development approach. A total of 78 students from the third (n = 30), fourth (n = 19) and fifth (n = 29) year of medical school voluntarily consented and were enrolled into the course. Overall, the Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty had a total of 555, 461, and 400 students enrolled in the third, fourth, and fifth year, respectively. The program has been evaluated based on students' learning achievements and survey responses.
resultsThe students' mean pre-test Fresno Test score improved from 49.9 ± 18.2 to 118.9 ± 26.3 post-training. The Cohen's effect size was 3.04 (95% CI, 2.6-3.5). The overall students' satisfaction score was 8.66 ± 1.09 on a 1 to 10 scale.
conclusionsThe program was effective in improving students' knowledge and skills on EBM. We propose to offer the program as an elective course during the third year of the medical school curriculum based on all data obtained during the program evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.