Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34407780›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2021

The CRCbiome study: a large prospective cohort study examining the role of lifestyle and the gut microbiome in colorectal cancer screening participants.

Ane Sørlie Kværner, Einar Birkeland, Cecilie Bucher-Johannessen, Elina Vinberg, Jan Inge Nordby, Harri Kangas, Vahid Bemanian, Pekka Ellonen, Edoardo Botteri, Erik Natvig and 17 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01538550 (Colorectal Cancer Screening in Norway), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01538550 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Colorectal Cancer Screening in Norway: Pilot Study of a National Screening Programme With Randomised Comparison of Different Screening Strategies to Provide the Best Possible Service to the Population

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorwegian Institute of Public HealthRan2012 to 2034Enrolled140,000ConditionsColorectal Cancer, Colorectal AdenomasArmsFlexible sigmoidoscopy, iFOBT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Ane Sørlie KværnerSection for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6247-7304
Einar BirkelandDepartment of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Cecilie Bucher-JohannessenDepartment of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Elina VinbergDepartment of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3556-1118
Jan Inge NordbyDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Harri KangasInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Vahid BemanianDepartment of Multidisciplinary Laboratory Science and Medical Biochemistry, Genetic Unit, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Pekka EllonenInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6072-0489
Edoardo BotteriSection for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9023-8068
Erik NatvigSection for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Torbjørn RognesDepartment of Informatics, Centre for Bioinformatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9329-9974
Eivind HovigDepartment of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9103-1077
Robert LyleDepartment of Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Ole Herman AmburDepartment of Microbiology and Infection Control, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9870-6375
Willem M de VosLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0273-3166
Scott BultmanDepartment of Genetics and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Anette HjartåkerDepartment of Nutrition, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Rikard LandbergDepartment of Biology and Biological Engineering, Division of Food and Nutrition Science, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6399-7608
Mingyang SongDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1324-0316
Hege Salvesen BlixDepartment of Drug Statistics, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4890-7555
Giske UrsinCancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0835-9507
Kristin Ranheim RandelSection for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Thomas de LangeMedical Department, Sahlgrenska University Hospital-Mölndal, Mölndal, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3989-7487
Geir HoffSection for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0118-6818
Øyvind HolmeSection for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Paula Berstad *Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway. paula.berstad@kreftregisteret.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9025-4455
Trine B Rounge *Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway. trine.rounge@kreftregisteret.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2677-2722

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) screening reduces CRC incidence and mortality. However, current screening methods are either hampered by invasiveness or suboptimal performance, limiting their effectiveness as primary screening methods. To aid in the development of a non-invasive screening test with improved sensitivity and specificity, we have initiated a prospective biomarker study (CRCbiome), nested within a large randomized CRC screening trial in Norway. We aim to develop a microbiome-based classification algorithm to identify advanced colorectal lesions in screening participants testing positive for an immunochemical fecal occult blood test (FIT). We will also examine interactions with host factors, diet, lifestyle and prescription drugs. The prospective nature of the study also enables the analysis of changes in the gut microbiome following the removal of precancerous lesions.

methodsThe CRCbiome study recruits participants enrolled in the Bowel Cancer Screening in Norway (BCSN) study, a randomized trial initiated in 2012 comparing once-only sigmoidoscopy to repeated biennial FIT, where women and men aged 50-74 years at study entry are invited to participate. Since 2017, participants randomized to FIT screening with a positive test result have been invited to join the CRCbiome study. Self-reported diet, lifestyle and demographic data are collected prior to colonoscopy after the positive FIT-test (baseline). Screening data, including colonoscopy findings are obtained from the BCSN database. Fecal samples for gut microbiome analyses are collected both before and 2 and 12 months after colonoscopy. Samples are analyzed using metagenome sequencing, with taxonomy profiles, and gene and pathway content as primary measures. CRCbiome data will also be linked to national registries to obtain information on prescription histories and cancer relevant outcomes occurring during the 10 year follow-up period. DISCUSSION: The CRCbiome study will increase our understanding of how the gut microbiome, in combination with lifestyle and environmental factors, influences the early stages of colorectal carcinogenesis. This knowledge will be crucial to develop microbiome-based screening tools for CRC. By evaluating biomarker performance in a screening setting, using samples from the target population, the generalizability of the findings to future screening cohorts is likely to be high.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01538550 .

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeLife StyleAgedCase-Control StudiesColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNorwayOccult BloodPrognosisAdenomaAdvanced neoplasiaBiomarkersColonoscopyColorectal cancerDietFITGut microbiomeiFOBTLifestyleMetagenomics sequencingPrescription drugsScreening

Identifiers

PMID34407780
PMCPMC8371800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.