Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2021
Similar outcomes in computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: ten-year results of a prospective randomized study.
Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01022099 (Prospective Randomized Trial of Navigated and Conventional TKA With Radiographic and CT Evaluations), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective Randomized Trial of Navigated and Conventional TKA With Radiographic and CT Evaluations
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of navigation on functional and radiological outcomes after total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective analysis of one hundred and ninety cases.International orthopaedics · 2025Article
- CORR Synthesis: What Is the Role of Robotic-assisted Technology in Knee Arthroplasty?Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2025Article
- Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Update.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Computer-Assisted versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty at 5-Year Follow-Up: Is There Any Benefit?Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Alignment analysis of Brainlab knee 3 navigation-guided total knee arthroplasty using the adjusted mechanical method.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundComputer-assisted navigation (CAS) was developed to improve the surgical accuracy and precision. Many studies demonstrated better alignment in the coronal plane in CAS TKA compared to conventional technique. The influence on the functional outcome is still unclear. Only few studies report long-term results of CAS TKA. This study was initiated to investigate 10-year patient-reported outcome of CAS and conventional TKA.
methodsFrom initially 80 patients of a randomized study of CAS and conventional TKA a total of 50 patients could be evaluated at the 10-year follow-up. The Knee Society Score and EuroQuol Questionnaire were assessed. For all patients a competing risk analysis for revision was performed.
resultsThe patient-reported outcome measures demonstrated similar values for both groups. The 10-year risk for revision was 2.5% for conventional TKA and 7.5% for CAS TKA (p=0.237).
conclusionsThere was no difference between CAS and conventional TKA with regard to patient-reported outcome and revision risk ten years after surgery.
trial registrationThis study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov on 11/30/2009, ID: NCT01022099 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.