Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34407461›Full record

ArticleReproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.)2021

Effects of RAD51-stimulatory compound 1 (RS-1) and its vehicle, DMSO, on pig embryo culture.

C G Lucas, B K Redel, P R Chen, L D Spate, R S Prather, K D Wells

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C G LucasNational Swine Resource and Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA; Division of Animal Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA. Electronic address: lucascg@missouri.edu.
B K RedelNational Swine Resource and Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA; USDA-ARS, Plant Genetics Unit, Columbia, MO, USA.
P R ChenDivision of Animal Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
L D SpateDivision of Animal Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
R S PratherNational Swine Resource and Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA; Division of Animal Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
K D WellsNational Swine Resource and Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA; Division of Animal Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
University of Missouri · US

Funding

Resource Core for National Swine Resource and Research Center (NSRRC) Years 21-25U42OD011140 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI Kiho Lee · 2012 to 2026
$26.7M
NIH HHS U42 OD011140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pigs have become an important model for agricultural and biomedical purposes. The advent of genomic engineering tools, such as the CRISPR/Cas9 system, has facilitated the production of livestock models with desired modifications. However, precise site-specific modifications in pigs through the homology-directed repair (HDR) pathway remains a challenge. In mammalian embryos, the use of small molecules to inhibit non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or to improve HDR have been tested, but little is known about their toxicity. The compound RS-1 stimulates the activity of the RAD51 protein, which plays a key role in the HDR mechanism, demonstrating enhancement of HDR events in rabbit and bovine zygotes. Thus, in this study, we evaluated the dosage and temporal effects of RS-1 on porcine embryo development and viability. Additionally, we assessed the effects of its vehicle, DMSO, during embryo in vitro culture. Transient exposure to 7.5 μM of RS-1 did not adversely affect early embryo development and was compatible with subsequent development to term. Additionally, low concentrations of its vehicle, DMSO, did not show any toxicity to in vitro produced embryos. The transient use of RS-1 at 7.5 μM during in vitro culture seems to be the best protocol of choice to reduce the potentially toxic effects of RS-1 while attempting to improve HDR in the pig. Direct injection of the CRISPR/Cas9 system, combined with strategies to increase the frequency of targeted modifications via HDR, have become an important tool to simplify and accelerate the production of genetically modified livestock models.

Indexed as

Rad51 RecombinaseAnimalsBenzamidesDimethyl SulfoxideEmbryo, MammalianEmbryonic DevelopmentEmbryo TransferMembrane Potential, MitochondrialSulfonamidesSwineTissue Culture Techniques3-((benzylamino)sulfonyl)-4-bromo-N-(4-bromophenyl)benzamideBenzamidesDimethyl SulfoxideRad51 RecombinaseSulfonamidesHomology-directed repair (HDR)In vitro culturePig embryosRS-1Toxic effects

Identifiers

PMID34407461
PMCPMC8511169
OpenAlexW3193695519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.