Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34407127›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Factors impacting resilience as a result of exposure to COVID-19: The ecological resilience model.

Anna Panzeri, Marco Bertamini, Sarah Butter, Liat Levita, Jilly Gibson-Miller, Giulio Vidotto, Richard P Bentall, Kate Mary Bennett

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Differences in perceived threat and trauma in children during the COVID-19 pandemic.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna PanzeriDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5999-858X
Marco BertaminiDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8617-6864
Sarah ButterUniversity of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.
Liat LevitaUniversity of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.
Jilly Gibson-MillerUniversity of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.
Giulio VidottoDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Richard P BentallUniversity of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.
Kate Mary BennettDepartment of Psychological Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
University of Sheffield · GBUniversity of Padua · ITUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the severe psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, some individuals do not develop high levels of psychological distress and can be termed resilient. Using the ecological resilience model, we examined factors promoting or hindering resilience in the COVID-19 pandemic. Of the 1034 participants (49.9±16.2 years; females 51.2%) from Italian general population, 70% displayed resilient outcomes and 30% reported moderate-severe anxiety and/or depression. A binary regression model revealed that factors promoting resilience were mostly psychological (e.g., trait resilience, conscientiousness) together with social distancing. Conversely, factors hindering resilience included COVID-19-anxiety, COVID-19-related PTSD symptoms, intolerance of uncertainty, loneliness, living with children, higher education, and living in regions where the virus was starting to spread. In conclusion, the ecological resilience model in the COVID-19 pandemic explained 64% of the variance and identified factors promoting or hindering resilient outcomes. Critically, these findings can inform psychological interventions supporting individuals by strengthening factors associated with resilience.

Indexed as

Resilience, PsychologicalAdultAgedAnxietyCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedModels, PsychologicalPhysical DistancingRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID34407127
PMCPMC8372944
OpenAlexW3194457973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.