Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34407122›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Pheno4D: A spatio-temporal dataset of maize and tomato plant point clouds for phenotyping and advanced plant analysis.

David Schunck, Federico Magistri, Radu Alexandru Rosu, André Cornelißen, Nived Chebrolu, Stefan Paulus, Jens Léon, Sven Behnke, Cyrill Stachniss, Heiner Kuhlmann and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. 3D-OGT: 3D organ growth tracking with minimum segmentation.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Deep learning for three-dimensional (3D) plant phenomics.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

David SchunckGeodesy Lab, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2601-1413
Federico MagistriPhotogrammetry and Robotics Lab, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Radu Alexandru RosuAutonomous Intelligent Systems Lab, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
André CornelißenGeodesy Lab, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Nived ChebroluPhotogrammetry and Robotics Lab, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Stefan PaulusInstitute of Sugar Beet Research, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Jens LéonINRES Plant Breeding, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6514-3112
Sven BehnkeAutonomous Intelligent Systems Lab, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5040-7525
Cyrill StachnissPhotogrammetry and Robotics Lab, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Heiner KuhlmannGeodesy Lab, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Lasse KlingbeilGeodesy Lab, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1941-150X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the growth and development of individual plants is of central importance in modern agriculture, crop breeding, and crop science. To this end, using 3D data for plant analysis has gained attention over the last years. High-resolution point clouds offer the potential to derive a variety of plant traits, such as plant height, biomass, as well as the number and size of relevant plant organs. Periodically scanning the plants even allows for performing spatio-temporal growth analysis. However, highly accurate 3D point clouds from plants recorded at different growth stages are rare, and acquiring this kind of data is costly. Besides, advanced plant analysis methods from machine learning require annotated training data and thus generate intense manual labor before being able to perform an analysis. To address these issues, we present with this dataset paper a multi-temporal dataset featuring high-resolution registered point clouds of maize and tomato plants, which we manually labeled for computer vision tasks, such as for instance segmentation and 3D reconstruction, providing approximately 260 million labeled 3D points. To highlight the usability of the data and to provide baselines for other researchers, we show a variety of applications ranging from point cloud segmentation to non-rigid registration and surface reconstruction. We believe that our dataset will help to develop new algorithms to advance the research for plant phenotyping, 3D reconstruction, non-rigid registration, and deep learning on raw point clouds. The dataset is freely accessible at https://www.ipb.uni-bonn.de/data/pheno4d/.

Indexed as

User-Computer InterfaceImaging, Three-DimensionalMachine LearningPhenotypePlant LeavesSolanum lycopersicumSpatio-Temporal AnalysisZea mays

Identifiers

PMID34407122
PMCPMC8372960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.