Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34407100›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Development of an alternative saliva test for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 using TRIzol: Adapting to countries with lower incomes looking for a large-scale detection program.

Haydee Miranda-Ortiz, Edith A Fernández-Figueroa, Erika B Ruíz-García, Anallely Muñoz-Rivas, Alejandra Méndez-Pérez, Jorge Méndez-Galván, Horacio Astudillo-de la Vega, Belem Gabiño-López, Ricardo Nava-Monroy, Alejandro López-Flores A la Torre and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Haydee Miranda-OrtizSequencing Unit, National Institute of Genomic Medicine, Mexico City, Mexico.
Edith A Fernández-FigueroaComputational and Integrative Genomics, National Institute of Genomic Medicine, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-5159-8300
Erika B Ruíz-GarcíaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Anallely Muñoz-RivasGenomic Diagnostic Laboratory, National Institute of Genomic Medicine, Mexico City, Mexico.
Alejandra Méndez-PérezClínica Sansce, Mexico City, Mexico.
Jorge Méndez-GalvánDirección de Investigación, Hospital Infantil de México "Federico Gómez", Mexico City, Mexico.
Horacio Astudillo-de la VegaTranslational Research Laboratory in Cancer & Cellular Therapy, Hospital de Oncologia, Siglo XXI, IMSS, Mexico City, Mexico.
Belem Gabiño-LópezLaboratory of Histology and Confocal Microscopy, National Institute of Genomic Medicine, Mexico City, Mexico.
Ricardo Nava-MonroyLaboratory of Histology and Confocal Microscopy, National Institute of Genomic Medicine, Mexico City, Mexico.
Alejandro López-Flores A la TorreClínica Sansce, Mexico City, Mexico.
Tanit López-Vergara AnayaClínica Sansce, Mexico City, Mexico.
Diana Vilar-CompteDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Uriel Coquis-NavarreteTranslational Medicine Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-2724-4112
Melissa Valdés-ReyesTranslational Medicine Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-8888-0484
Sokani Sánchez-MontesCentro de Medicina Tropical, División de Investigación, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Ingeborg BeckerCentro de Medicina Tropical, División de Investigación, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-3821-4998
National Institute of Genomic Medicine · MXInstituto Nacional de Cancerología · MXHospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez · MXUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXUniversidad Veracruzana · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of saliva for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 has shown to be a good alternative to nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS), since it permits self-collection, avoids the exposure of healthy persons to infected patients, reduces waiting times, eliminates the need of personal protective equipment and is non-invasive. Yet current saliva testing is still expensive due to the need of specialized tubes containing buffers to stabilize the RNA of SARS-CoV-2 and inactivate the virus. These tubes are expensive and not always accessible in sufficient quantities. We now developed an alternative saliva testing method, using TRIzol for extraction, viral inactivation, and storage of SARS-CoV-2 RNA, combined with RT-qPCR, which was comparable in its performance to NPS. Paired saliva samples and NPS were taken from 15 asymptomatic healthcare workers and one patient with SARS-CoV-2. Further 13 patients with SARS-CoV-2 were only saliva-tested. All the tests were performed according to CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel. Saliva (4 mL) was taken in sterile 50 mL tubes, 1.5 mL TRIzol were added and mixed. Our results show that 5 μL of saliva RNA extracted with TRIzol allow for an adequate detection of the virus in patients positive for SARS-CoV-2 and was equally sensitive to NPS in TRIzol. We conclude that saliva testing using TRIzol is a recommendable method for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 since it has several advantages over currently used saliva tests: it can be done with normal sterile tubes, does not need cold-chain handling, is stable at room temperature, is non-invasive and less costly, making it more accessible for low-income countries. Cheaper saliva testing using TRIzol is especially relevant for low-income countries to optimize diagnosis and help define quarantine durations for families, healthcare workers, schools, and other public workplaces, thus decreasing infections and mortality caused by SARS-CoV-2.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCOVID-19Developing CountriesDiagnostic Tests, RoutineEarly DiagnosisGuanidinesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNasopharynxPhenolsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, ViralSalivaGuanidinesPhenolsRNA, Viraltrizol

Identifiers

PMID34407100
PMCPMC8372963
OpenAlexW3194482175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.