Trial reportJournal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA2022
A prospective, randomized study assessing different modalities for flushing totally implanted vascular access device in children with malignancy.
Trial report in Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Is it feasible to prolong the flushing interval for totally implantable venous access devices (TIVADs)? A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Maintenance of Functionality Without Flushing of Totally Implantable Venous Access Devices: A Presentation of Clinical Cases.EJVES vascular forum · 2025Article
- Interaction of 6-Thioguanine with Aluminum Metal-Organic Framework Assisted by Mechano-Chemistry, In Vitro Delayed Drug Release, and Time-Dependent Toxicity to Leukemia Cells.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe totally implanted vascular access device (TIVAD) is commonly used in patients with malignant tumors requiring chemotherapy or long-term intravenous infusion and those with difficulty placing peripheral venous catheters. It could also be used to draw blood in pediatric patients. Thus, how to maintain the patency and longevity of TIVAD is always emphasized.
methodsIn this prospective study, TIVAD was randomly infused in patients under 18 years with three different concentrations of heparinized solutions: 10 mL with 100 U/mL heparin, 20 mL with 10 U/mL heparin, and 30 mL with 10 U/mL heparin.
resultsA total of 81 patients (46 males and 35 females) were enrolled in this study from August 2, 2013 to February 1, 2017. The mean age of those who received TIVAD implantation was 7.2 ± 5.3 years, and the mean duration of using TIVAD was 1027.6 ± 369.1 days. Patients without catheter occlusion events experienced significantly shorter hospitalizations, fewer admissions, and fewer punctures than those with catheter occlusion events (p < 0.05). The administration and frequency of blood transfusions, history of bacteremia, and medication history did not increase the risk of catheter occlusion, but puncture frequency increased this risk. In patients with catheter occlusion events (38/81, 46.9%), catheter patency was restored after instillation of urokinase solution.
conclusionIn this study, the risk of TIVAD catheter occlusion was only related to puncture frequency regardless of the heparin flush composition or patient characteristics. A high puncture frequency of TIVAD during the 3.5-year study period significantly increased the risk of catheter occlusion. Besides, flushing and locking solutions for TIVAD using heparin at 10 U/mL was effective as using heparin at 100 U/mL regardless of the flushing volume of 10, 20, or 30 mL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.