Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34406942›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society2021

Efficient TMS-Based Motor Cortex Mapping Using Gaussian Process Active Learning.

Razieh Faghihpirayesh, Mathew Yarossi, Tales Imbiriba, Dana H Brooks, Eugene Tunik, Deniz Erdogmus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. M2M-InvNet: Human Motor Cortex Mapping From Multi-Muscle Response Using TMS and Generative 3D Convolutional Network.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Razieh Faghihpirayesh
Mathew Yarossi
Tales Imbiriba
Dana H Brooks
Eugene Tunik
Deniz Erdogmus

Funding

Translational refinement of adaptive communication system for locked-in patientsR01DC009834 · NIDCD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI FRIED-OKEN, MELANIE · 2009 to 2024
$12.5M
Optimizing Hand Rehabilitation Post-Stroke Using Interactive Virtual EnvironmentsR01HD058301 · NICHD · NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ADAMOVICH, SERGEI V, MERIANS, ALMA S · 2009 to 2021
$4.7M
Planning and Updating in Frontoparietal Networks for GraspingR01NS085122 · NINDS · RBHS-SCHOOL/ HEALTH RELATED PROFESSIONS · PI ADAMOVICH, SERGEI V, TUNIK, EUGENE · 2014 to 2025
$3.2M
SCH: INT: Collaborative Research: Multimodal Signal Analysis and Data Fusion for Post-traumatic EpilepsyR01NS111744 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI DUNCAN, DOMINIQUE, ERDOGMUS, DENIZ · 2019 to 2022
$981k
Brain circuits in motor learningF31NS092268 · NINDS · RBHS-SCHOOL/ HEALTH RELATED PROFESSIONS · PI YAROSSI, MATHEW · 2015 to 2017
$77k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD058301NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009834NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS092268NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS085122NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS111744
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) can be used to map cortical motor topography by spatially sampling the sensorimotor cortex while recording Motor Evoked Potentials (MEP) with surface electromyography (EMG). Traditional sampling strategies are time-consuming and inefficient, as they ignore the fact that responsive sites are typically sparse and highly spatially correlated. An alternative approach, commonly employed when TMS mapping is used for presurgical planning, is to leverage the expertise of the coil operator to use MEPs elicited by previous stimuli as feedback to decide which loci to stimulate next. In this paper, we propose to automatically infer optimal future stimulus loci using active learning Gaussian Process-based sampling in place of user expertise. We first compare the user-guided (USRG) method to the traditional grid selection method and randomized sampling to verify that the USRG approach has superior performance. We then compare several novel active Gaussian Process (GP) strategies with the USRG approach. Experimental results using real data show that, as expected, the USRG method is superior to the grid and random approach in both time efficiency and MEP map accuracy. We also found that an active warped GP entropy and a GP random-based strategy performed equally as well as, or even better than, the USRG method. These methods were completely automatic, and succeeded in efficiently sampling the regions in which the MEP response variations are largely confined. This work provides the foundation for highly efficient, fully automatized TMS mapping, especially when considered in the context of advances in robotic coil operation.

Indexed as

Motor CortexTranscranial Magnetic StimulationElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, MotorHumansMuscle, Skeletal

Identifiers

PMID34406942
PMCPMC8452135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.