ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2021
Comparative Evaluation of Assays for Broad Detection of Molecular Resistance Mechanisms in
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rapid commercial CTX-M diagnostics: Performance, limitations and clinical impact.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Review
- Molecular insights into antimicrobial resistance in human bacterial pathogens: mechanisms, resistance genes, and translational diagnostic applications.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Prevalence of ESBL-Resistant Genes in Birds in Italy-A Comprehensive Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Antimicrobial Resistance and Biofilm-Forming Ability in ESBL-Producing and Non-ESBL-ProducingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Antimicrobial resistance at a turning point: microbial drivers, one health, and global futures.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Detecting antibiotic resistance: classical, molecular, advanced bioengineering, and AI-enhanced approaches.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Laboratory detection of carbapenemases among Gram-negative organisms.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024Review
- Performance evaluation of the Streck ARM-DJournal of global antimicrobial resistance · 2024Article
- Emergence of resistance to last-resort antimicrobials in bacteremia patients: A multicenter analysis of bloodstream pathogens in Korea.PloS one · 2024Observational
- Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamases (ESBL) Producing Bacteria in Animals.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Multicenter Evaluation of the Acuitas AMR Gene Panel for Detection of an Extended Panel of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes among Bacterial Isolates.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid detection of antimicrobial resistance in both surveillance and diagnostic settings is still a major challenge for the clinical lab, compounded by the rapid evolution of antibiotic resistance mechanisms. This study compares four methods for the broad detection of antibiotic resistance genes in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.