ArticleHeart and vessels2022
Distensibility of the ductus arteriosus in neonates and young infants undergoing transcatheter closure.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Device migration is one of serious complications in neonates and infants undergoing transcatheter closure of the patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). We hypothesize that neonates and young infants possess the distensibility of the ductus, which may be related to device migration. We retrospectively reviewed angiographic findings in 41 neonates and infants who underwent transcatheter closure of PDA. We measured diameters of the ductus at the pulmonary (PA) side, the center, and the aortic (AO) side before PDA closure, and the device center diameter after device closure. The distensibility index was defined as the ratio of the device center diameter after device deployment to the diameter at the center of the ductus before PDA closure. Age and weight at the procedure were 168 (117-260) days and 5.3 (4.3-6.9) kg, respectively. Thirty-seven subjects accomplished the successful device closure, and four subjects were declined because of the device instability or migration. Implanted devices included Amplatzer Duct Occluders in 33 subjects and Amplatzer Vascular Plug-2 in 8 subjects. The PDA diameters at PA side, at the center, AO side, and the device center diameter were 3.2 (2.2-4.3) mm, 4.7 (3.6-5.7) mm, 7.7 (6.3-9.4) mm, and 5.8 (4.2-6.9) mm, respectively. The PDA diameter before closure was not correlated age and weight. The distensibility index was 1.28 (1.06-1.64), which was significantly correlated to age (r = - 0.49, P = 0.001) and weight (r = - 0.53, P < 0.001). Infants with the younger age and the lower weight have the more distensible PDA, which may be a risk for device migration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.