ArticleDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2022
[Digital documentation of complications in visceral surgery: possibilities and evaluation of an instrument for quality management].
Article in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Morbidity and Mortality after Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC in a National Reference Center: A Six-Year Experience under Independent Evaluation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical therapy and care: a cross-sectional study.BMC surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Against the background of the growing economization of clinical medicine, in the last decades the topics of risk and complication management have also become more important in surgical disciplines. The standardization and reproducible documentation of outcome and complication data play a key role for valid quality control. In this article a digital system implemented at the surgical clinic of the Charité University Medicine in Berlin is analyzed with respect to its practicability for perioperative and postoperative monitoring of complications within the framework of quality assurance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34406438What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.