Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34406436›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2022

An empirical study on hospital-based prevention of recurrent urinary stone disease in Germany.

Alina Reicherz, Patricia Rausch, Roman Herout, Joachim Noldus, Peter Bach

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Kidney stone disease Practice patterns among urologists in Canada.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alina ReicherzDepartment of Urology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Hölkeskampring 40, 44625, Herne, Germany. alina.reicherz@rub.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1587-4432
Patricia RauschDepartment of Urology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Hölkeskampring 40, 44625, Herne, Germany.
Roman HeroutDepartment of Urology, University Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.
Joachim NoldusDepartment of Urology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Hölkeskampring 40, 44625, Herne, Germany.
Peter BachDepartment of Urology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Hölkeskampring 40, 44625, Herne, Germany.
Universitätsklinik Marien Hospital Herne · DEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft RE 4611/2-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUrinary stone disease is a common disease with a prevalence of 4.7% in Germany. The incidence increased over the last decades, and recurrence rates are up to 50% in the first 5 years after diagnosis. Adequate preventive measures can avoid up to 46% of stone recurrences. These numbers outline the importance of prevention. Especially among high-risk stone formers, specific diagnostics and measures are required. Published data indicate the divergence between the importance of prevention and its implementation in everyday clinical practice. This is the first survey among German urological departments highlighting medical care concerning the prevention of recurrent urinary stone disease, identifying challenges and providing recommendations for improvements.

methodsTwo hundred and seventy urological hospital departments in Germany were anonymously surveyed about measurements to prevent recurrent stone disease. The questionnaire comprised 23 items dealing with diagnostics, counselling, knowledge among doctors concerning preventive measures and difficulties in preventing recurrent urinary stone disease.

resultsSixty-three urological departments (23.8%) answered the survey. The majority perform stone analysis at first and repeat events. Most patients with urinary stone disease receive general advice on preventive measures during their hospitalization. General recommendations focus on fluid intake and lifestyle changes. However, specific diets are infrequently recommended by inpatient urologists. Diagnostics to identify high-risk stone formers are mostly insufficient, and guideline-compliant urine tests are uncommon.

conclusionThe quality of secondary prevention needs to improve considerably. The focus should be put on identifying high-risk stone formers and offering those patients specific counselling. Furthermore, general advice on dietary recommendations should be extended.

Indexed as

HospitalizationGermanyHumansRecurrenceUrinary CalculiEmpirical studyGermanyPreventionRecurrent urinary stone diseaseSurvey

Identifiers

PMID34406436
PMCPMC8813807
OpenAlexW3195096809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.