Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34406418›Full record

ReviewInternational urogynecology journal2022

Colpocleisis as an obliterative surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: is it still a viable option in the twenty-first century? Narrative review.

Magdalena Emilia Grzybowska, Konrad Futyma, Aida Kusiak, Dariusz Grzegorz Wydra

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International urogynecology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06419075 (Local Infiltration of TranExamic Acid in Surgical Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06419075 phase4withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Local Infiltration of TranExamic Acid in Surgical Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: a Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Texas Medical Branch, GalvestonRan2024 to 2025Enrolled0ConditionsPelvic Organ ProlapseArmsTranexamic acid, Vasopressin, NaCl 0.9%
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Urinary outcomes following colpocleisis without concomitant anti-incontinence procedure: A retrospective single-center study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Surgical treatment of apical prolapse Number 9 - 2026.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Post-colpocleisis pyocolpos: Three case reports.Case reports in women's health · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Magdalena Emilia GrzybowskaDepartment of Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology and Gynecologic Endocrinology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Smoluchowskiego 17, 80-214, Gdańsk, Poland. mgrzybowska@gumed.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5311-3450
Konrad Futyma2nd Department of Gynecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Aida KusiakDepartment of Periodontology and Oral Mucosa Diseases, Medical University of Gdansk, Orzeszkowej 18, 80-204, Gdansk, Poland.
Dariusz Grzegorz WydraDepartment of Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology and Gynecologic Endocrinology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Smoluchowskiego 17, 80-214, Gdańsk, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThe aims were to review the literature from the last two decades and analyze treatment efficacy and findings of the studies on colpocleisis.

methodsA systematic search was conducted within the MEDLINE/PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov databases, using the following keywords: pelvic organ prolapse (POP), colpocleisis, obliterative, and LeFort. All English full-text prospective and retrospective observational and interventional studies were included. Anatomical and subjective success, surgical techniques, concomitant procedures, complication rates, anesthesia methods, and decision regret were analyzed.

resultsA total of 237 papers were identified and 49 met the inclusion criteria. Mean patient age was 69.0 ± 8.0 to 84 ± 3.1. Over 90.2% of patients undergoing colpocleisis were diagnosed with POP stage ≥ 3. The follow-up ranged from 30 days to a median of 5 years. Anatomical success, defined as POP-Q stage ≤ 1 and no prolapse beyond the hymen, was achieved in 62.5 to 100% and 87.5 to 100% of all patients respectively. Subjective success ranged from 88% to 100%. Regret over the loss of coital ability ranged from 0% in many studies to 12.9%, general decision regret from 0% to 13.8%. After concomitant midurethral sling surgery, 86.8% to 94% of all patients were continent, with a 0-14% sling revision rate due to urinary retention. Urinary tract infection was the most common postoperative complication (4.3 to 9% confirmed with urine culture, 34.7% based on symptom definition). Bowel (0 to 2.7%) and urinary tract (0 to 9.1%) injuries were the consequences of concomitant procedures. The mortality rates were up to 1.3%.

conclusionsColpocleisis is a heterogeneous procedure, characterized by high subjective and objective success, low coital ability regret, and a low risk of complications.

Indexed as

Gynecologic Surgical ProceduresPelvic Organ ProlapseFemaleHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeVaginaColpocleisisComplicationsPelvic organ prolapseRegretSatisfactionSuccess

Identifiers

PMID34406418
PMCPMC8739283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.