Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34406415›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2021

RNAProt: an efficient and feature-rich RNA binding protein binding site predictor.

Michael Uhl, Van Dinh Tran, Florian Heyl, Rolf Backofen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. mArXiv · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. RNA-binding proteins connect Exon usage to the chromatin.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. RNA binding proteins in cardiovascular development and disease.Current topics in developmental biology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael UhlBioinformatics Group, Department of Computer Science, University of Freiburg, Georges-Koehler-Allee 106, 79110 Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9563-4991
Van Dinh TranBioinformatics Group, Department of Computer Science, University of Freiburg, Georges-Koehler-Allee 106, 79110 Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7357-4959
Florian HeylBioinformatics Group, Department of Computer Science, University of Freiburg, Georges-Koehler-Allee 106, 79110 Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3651-5685
Rolf BackofenBioinformatics Group, Department of Computer Science, University of Freiburg, Georges-Koehler-Allee 106, 79110 Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8231-3323
University of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCross-linking and immunoprecipitation followed by next-generation sequencing (CLIP-seq) is the state-of-the-art technique used to experimentally determine transcriptome-wide binding sites of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs). However, it relies on gene expression, which can be highly variable between conditions and thus cannot provide a complete picture of the RBP binding landscape. This creates a demand for computational methods to predict missing binding sites. Although there exist various methods using traditional machine learning and lately also deep learning, we encountered several problems: many of these are not well documented or maintained, making them difficult to install and use, or are not even available. In addition, there can be efficiency issues, as well as little flexibility regarding options or supported features.

resultsHere, we present RNAProt, an efficient and feature-rich computational RBP binding site prediction framework based on recurrent neural networks. We compare RNAProt with 1 traditional machine learning approach and 2 deep-learning methods, demonstrating its state-of-the-art predictive performance and better run time efficiency. We further show that its implemented visualizations capture known binding preferences and thus can help to understand what is learned. Since RNAProt supports various additional features (including user-defined features, which no other tool offers), we also present their influence on benchmark set performance. Finally, we show the benefits of incorporating additional features, specifically structure information, when learning the binding sites of an hairpin loop binding RBP.

conclusionsRNAProt provides a complete framework for RBP binding site predictions, from data set generation over model training to the evaluation of binding preferences and prediction. It offers state-of-the-art predictive performance, as well as superior run time efficiency, while at the same time supporting more features and input types than any other tool available so far. RNAProt is easy to install and use, comes with comprehensive documentation, and is accompanied by informative statistics and visualizations. All this makes RNAProt a valuable tool to apply in future RBP binding site research.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerRNABinding SitesProtein BindingRNA-Binding ProteinsRNARNA-Binding ProteinsCLIP-seqdeep learningeCLIPRBP binding site predictionrecurrent neural networksvisualization

Identifiers

PMID34406415
PMCPMC8372218
OpenAlexW3193881848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.