ArticleGigaScience2021
RNAProt: an efficient and feature-rich RNA binding protein binding site predictor.
Article in GigaScience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- mArXiv · 2026Article
- Bridging sequence-structure motifs and genetic variants for genome-wide dynamic RNA-protein interaction profiling.Nature communications · 2026Article
- RNA-binding proteins connect Exon usage to the chromatin.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Base-resolution binding profile prediction of proteins on RNAs with deep learning.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- LncPTPred: predicting lncRNA-protein interaction based on crosslinking and immunoprecipitation (CLIP-Seq) data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- A searchable atlas of pathogen-sensitive lncRNA networks in human macrophages.Nature communications · 2025Article
- A deep learning model for characterizing protein-RNA interactions from sequences at single-base resolution.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Emerging RNA-centric technologies to probe RNA-protein interactions: importance in decoding the life cycle of positive sense single strand RNA viruses and antiviral discovery.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
- Review
- RNA binding proteins in cardiovascular development and disease.Current topics in developmental biology · 2024Article
- A systematic benchmark of machine learning methods for protein-RNA interaction prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- De novo prediction of RNA-protein interactions with graph neural networks.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2022Article
- A comprehensive survey on computational learning methods for analysis of gene expression data.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Review
- RNAProt: an efficient and feature-rich RNA binding protein binding site predictor.GigaScience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCross-linking and immunoprecipitation followed by next-generation sequencing (CLIP-seq) is the state-of-the-art technique used to experimentally determine transcriptome-wide binding sites of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs). However, it relies on gene expression, which can be highly variable between conditions and thus cannot provide a complete picture of the RBP binding landscape. This creates a demand for computational methods to predict missing binding sites. Although there exist various methods using traditional machine learning and lately also deep learning, we encountered several problems: many of these are not well documented or maintained, making them difficult to install and use, or are not even available. In addition, there can be efficiency issues, as well as little flexibility regarding options or supported features.
resultsHere, we present RNAProt, an efficient and feature-rich computational RBP binding site prediction framework based on recurrent neural networks. We compare RNAProt with 1 traditional machine learning approach and 2 deep-learning methods, demonstrating its state-of-the-art predictive performance and better run time efficiency. We further show that its implemented visualizations capture known binding preferences and thus can help to understand what is learned. Since RNAProt supports various additional features (including user-defined features, which no other tool offers), we also present their influence on benchmark set performance. Finally, we show the benefits of incorporating additional features, specifically structure information, when learning the binding sites of an hairpin loop binding RBP.
conclusionsRNAProt provides a complete framework for RBP binding site predictions, from data set generation over model training to the evaluation of binding preferences and prediction. It offers state-of-the-art predictive performance, as well as superior run time efficiency, while at the same time supporting more features and input types than any other tool available so far. RNAProt is easy to install and use, comes with comprehensive documentation, and is accompanied by informative statistics and visualizations. All this makes RNAProt a valuable tool to apply in future RBP binding site research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.