Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34406388›Full record

ArticleThe Gerontologist2022

Affective Practices of Diabetes Self-Management Among Older Adults: Cumulative Effects of Childhood Adversity.

Erin G Roth, Sarah Chard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Gerontologist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Erin G RothDepartment of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Sarah ChardCenter for Aging Studies, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Funding

The Subjective Experience of Diabetes Among Urban Older AdultsR01AG041709 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY · PI ECKERT, JOHN KEVIN · 2012 to 2014
$1.3M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG041709
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesA strong correlation exists between Type 2 diabetes mellitus and adverse childhood experiences. How adverse childhood experiences inform later-life diabetes management is less understood. This article examines diabetes management from the perspective of affective practice to explore the lingering impact of trauma biographies in diabetes management. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsThis secondary narrative analysis of 15 in-depth interviews with community-dwelling older adults with diabetes (subsample of the Subjective Experiences of Diabetes Study) focuses on the ways their reported childhood adversity affects perceptions of and responses to diabetes self-management.

resultsThe experiences of adversity in childhood accumulate, throughout the life course, in the affective practices informing diabetes self-management, from blood glucose testing, to food consumption, to the emotions invested in body size. We identify 3 thematic areas that emerged across participants: (a) undermining self-worth, (b) (over)eating and food as comfort, and (c) weight and body size. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Our findings highlight affective practices as a mechanism through which adverse events accumulate and shape well-being over the life course. This analysis also suggests the potential for (de)accumulation of affective practices to improve diabetes management. The findings support recent calls for trauma-informed clinical care.

Indexed as

Adverse Childhood ExperiencesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Self-ManagementAgedEmotionsHumansLife Change EventsAdverse childhood experiencesEmotionsNarrative analysisPragmaticsShame

Identifiers

PMID34406388
PMCPMC9019651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.