Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34406348›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2021

Single-cell Hi-C data analysis: safety in numbers.

Aleksandra A Galitsyna, Mikhail S Gelfand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. ScHiCAtt: Enhancing single-cell Hi-C data resolution using attention-based models.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  16. Single-Cell Hi-C Analysis Workflow with Pairtools.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  17. Advancements and future directions in single-cell Hi-C based 3D chromatin modeling.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aleksandra A GalitsynaSkolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Skolkovo, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-8969-5694
Mikhail S GelfandSkolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Skolkovo, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4181-0846

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade, genome-wide assays for chromatin interactions in single cells have enabled the study of individual nuclei at unprecedented resolution and throughput. Current chromosome conformation capture techniques survey contacts for up to tens of thousands of individual cells, improving our understanding of genome function in 3D. However, these methods recover a small fraction of all contacts in single cells, requiring specialised processing of sparse interactome data. In this review, we highlight recent advances in methods for the interpretation of single-cell genomic contacts. After discussing the strengths and limitations of these methods, we outline frontiers for future development in this rapidly moving field.

Indexed as

ChromosomesModels, MolecularMolecular ConformationChromatinChromosome MappingComputational BiologyComputer GraphicsData AnalysisDNAGenomicsHumansSingle-Cell AnalysisWorkflowChromatinDNAchromatinconformation capturesingle cellsingle-cell Hi-Csingle-cell sequencing

Identifiers

PMID34406348
PMCPMC8575028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.