Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34406332›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2021

Phenotypic Consequences of the GJD2 Risk Genotype in Myopia Development.

Annechien E G Haarman, Clair A Enthoven, Milly S Tedja, Jan R Polling, J Willem L Tideman, Jan E E Keunen, Camiel J F Boon, Janine F Felix, H Raat, Annette J M Geerards and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Electrical responses from human retinal cone pathways associate with a common genetic polymorphism implicated in myopia.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Annechien E G HaarmanErasmus Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Clair A EnthovenErasmus Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Milly S TedjaErasmus Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan R PollingErasmus Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Willem L TidemanErasmus Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan E E KeunenUniversity Medical Center St Radboud, Department of Ophthalmology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Camiel J F BoonLeiden University Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology, The Netherlands.
Janine F FelixErasmus Medical Center, Department of Epidemiology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
H RaatErasmus University Medical Centre, Department of Public Health, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Annette J M GeerardsThe Rotterdam Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Gregorius P M LuytenLeiden University Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology, The Netherlands.
Gwyneth A van RijnLeiden University Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology, The Netherlands.
Virginie J M VerhoevenErasmus Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Caroline C W KlaverErasmus Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLRotterdam Eye Hospital · NLUniversity of Applied Sciences Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To study the relatively high effect of the refractive error gene GJD2 in human myopia, and to assess its relationship with refractive error, ocular biometry and lifestyle in various age groups. Methods: The population-based Rotterdam Study (RS), high myopia case-control study MYopia STudy, and the birth-cohort study Generation R were included in this study. Spherical equivalent (SER), axial length (AL), axial length/corneal radius (AL/CR), vitreous depth (VD), and anterior chamber depth (ACD) were measured using standard ophthalmologic procedures. Biometric measurements were compared between GJD2 (rs524952) genotype groups; education and environmental risk score (ERS) were calculated to estimate gene-environment interaction effects, using the Synergy index (SI). Results: RS adults carrying two risk alleles had a lower SER and longer AL, ACD and VD (AA versus TT, 0.23D vs. 0.70D; 23.79 mm vs. 23.52 mm; 2.72 mm vs. 2.65 mm; 16.12 mm vs. 15.87 mm; all P < 0.001). Children carrying two risk alleles had larger AL/CR at ages 6 and 9 years (2.88 vs. 2.87 and 3.00 vs. 2.96; all P < 0.001). Education and ERS both negatively influenced myopia and the biometric outcomes, but gene-environment interactions did not reach statistical significance (SI 1.25 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.85-1.85] and 1.17 [95% CI, 0.55-2.50] in adults and children). Conclusions: The elongation of the eye caused by the GJD2 risk genotype follows a dose-response pattern already visible at the age of 6 years. These early effects are an example of how a common myopia gene may drive myopia.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationPopulation SurveillanceRefraction, OcularAllelesAnterior ChamberAxial Length, EyeBiometryCase-Control StudiesChildConnexinsDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGap Junction delta-2 ProteinGenotypeHumansConnexinsGap Junction delta-2 ProteinRNA

Identifiers

PMID34406332
PMCPMC8375003
OpenAlexW3194281259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.