Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34406325›Full record

SynthesisJAMA psychiatry2021

Examination of Dosing of Antipsychotic Drugs for Relapse Prevention in Patients With Stable Schizophrenia: A Meta-analysis.

Stefan Leucht, Sofia Bauer, Spyridon Siafis, Tasnim Hamza, Hui Wu, Johannes Schneider-Thoma, Georgia Salanti, John M Davis

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Stefan LeuchtDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Sofia BauerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Spyridon SiafisDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Tasnim HamzaInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Hui WuDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Johannes Schneider-ThomaDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Georgia SalantiInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
John M DavisPsychiatric Institute, University of Illinois at Chicago.
Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine · CHTechnical University of Munich · DEJohns Hopkins University · USKing's College London · GBLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The doses of antipsychotic drugs needed for relapse prevention in schizophrenia is a debated issue. Objective: To examine dose-response findings in a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Data Sources: Studies were identified through the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register of Trials (March 9, 2020), PubMed (January 1, 2021), and previous reviews. First authors and/or pharmaceutical companies were contacted for additional information. Study Selection: Two reviewers independently selected randomized clinical trials that compared fixed doses of a second-generation antipsychotic, haloperidol, or fluphenazine for relapse prevention in patients with stable schizophrenia. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guideline, all parameters in duplicate were extracted and frequentist dose-response random-effects meta-analyses were conducted. Main Outcomes and Measures: Study-defined relapse (primary outcome), rehospitalization, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale or Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale total score reduction from baseline, all-cause discontinuation, and dropouts due to adverse events. Results: Evidence from 72 dose arms from 26 studies with 4776 participants was analyzed. The efficacy-related dose-response curves had a hyperbolic shape meaning that the probability to relapse decreased rapidly with doses of up to 5-mg/d risperidone equivalent (relative relapse risk, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.31-0.57; standardized mean difference for Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score reduction, -0.55; 95% CI, -0.68 to -0.41), but flattened thereafter. In contrast, dropouts due to adverse events continued to increase beyond this dose (relative risk at 5 mg/d, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.87-2.55; relative risk at 15 mg/d, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.49-4.62). In a subgroup analysis of patients in remission, a plateau was reached earlier, at approximately 2.5-mg/d risperidone equivalent. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that doses higher than approximately 5-mg/d risperidone equivalent may provide limited additional benefit for relapse prevention but more adverse events. For patients in remission or who are receiving high-potency first-generation antipsychotics, doses as low as 2.5-mg/d risperidone equivalent may be sufficient. However, caution is needed at this low dose end when further decreases of dose may be accompanied by a disproportionally higher relapse risk. Moreover, the observations are averages, and factors such as slow or rapid metabolism, age, illness stage, comorbidities, and drug-drug interactions suggest that individual patients will often need higher or lower doses.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareSecondary PreventionAntipsychotic AgentsHumansSchizophreniaAntipsychotic Agents

Identifiers

PMID34406325
PMCPMC8374744
OpenAlexW3193689311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.