Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34406046›Full record

ReviewThe CRISPR journal2021

Governing Heritable Human Genome Editing: A Textual History and a Proposal for the Future.

LeRoy Walters, Robert M Cook-Deegan, Eli Y Adashi

Open access · hybridAbstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in The CRISPR journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Ethics of Human Embryo Editing via CRISPR-Cas9 Technology: A Systematic Review of Ethical Arguments, Reasons, and Concerns.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2025
    Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

LeRoy WaltersKennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA; Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0640-130X
Robert M Cook-DeeganConsortium for Science, Policy, and Outcomes, Arizona State University, Washington, DC, USA; and Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8251-4237
Eli Y AdashiDepartment of Medical Science, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7730-1192
Brown University · USGeorgetown University · US

Funding

The Sulston Project: making the knowledge commons for interpreting cancer genomic variants more effectiveR01CA237118 · NCI · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI COOK-DEEGAN, ROBERT MULLAN, MCGUIRE, AMY L · 2019 to 2022
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA237118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heritable human genome editing (HHGE) has become a topic of intense public interest, especially since 2015. In the early 1980s, a related topic-human genetic engineering-was the subject of sustained public discussion. There was particular concern about germline genetic intervention. During the 1980s debate, an advisory committee to the Director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH)-the Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee (RAC)-agreed to provide initial public review of proposals for deliberate introduction of DNA into human beings. In 1984 and 1985, the RAC developed guidelines for research involving DNA transfer into patients. The committee also commented on the possibility of deliberately altering the human germline. We track the textual changes over time in the RAC's response to the possibility of germline genetic intervention in humans. In 2019, the NIH RAC was abolished. New techniques for genome editing, including CRISPR-based techniques, make both somatic and germline alterations much more feasible. These novel capabilities have again raised questions about oversight. We propose the creation of a new structure for the public oversight of proposals to perform HHGE. In parallel with a technical review by a regulatory agency, such proposals should also be publicly evaluated by a presidentially appointed Bioethics Advisory Commission.

Indexed as

Gene EditingGenome, HumanAdvisory CommitteesDNA, RecombinantGenetic EngineeringGenetic TherapyGerm CellsGovernment RegulationHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)United StatesDNA, Recombinant

Identifiers

PMID34406046
PMCPMC8392078
OpenAlexW3195279815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.