Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34405937›Full record

ReviewCytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology2022

Reference standards for flow cytometric estimation of absolute nuclear DNA content in plants.

Eva M Temsch, Petr Koutecký, Tomáš Urfus, Petr Šmarda, Jaroslav Doležel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Leaf Architecture and Genome Size Variation ofTropical life sciences research · 2024
    Article
  12. Genome Size in thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eva M TemschDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0805-9096
Petr KouteckýDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-3455-850X
Tomáš UrfusDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague 2, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-6878-6503
Petr ŠmardaDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Jaroslav DoleželCentre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Institute of Experimental Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Olomouc, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-6263-0492

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The estimation of nuclear DNA content has been by far the most popular application of flow cytometry in plants. Because flow cytometry measures relative fluorescence intensities of nuclei stained by a DNA fluorochrome, ploidy determination, and estimation of the nuclear DNA content in absolute units both require comparison to a reference standard of known DNA content. This implies that the quality of the results obtained depends on the standard selection and use. Internal standardization, when the nuclei of an unknown sample and the reference standard are isolated, stained, and measured simultaneously, is mandatory for precise measurements. As DNA peaks representing G

Indexed as

Genome, PlantPloidiesDNA, PlantFlow CytometryReference StandardsDNA, Plantbest practicesC-valueflow cytometryGC contentgenome sizeplant sciencesplant standard speciesstandardization

Identifiers

PMID34405937
PMCPMC9545105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.