Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34405757›Full record

ReviewSmall GTPases2022

Seeing is believing: tools to study the role of Rho GTPases during cytokinesis.

Su Pin Koh, Nhat Phi Pham, Alisa Piekny

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Small GTPases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Muscle stem cells get a new look: Dynamic cellular projections as sensors of the stem cell niche.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Su Pin KohDepartment of Biology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4410-6259
Nhat Phi PhamDepartment of Biology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3586-6053
Alisa PieknyDepartment of Biology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4264-6980
Concordia University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cytokinesis is required to cleave the daughter cells at the end of mitosis and relies on the spatiotemporal control of RhoA GTPase. Cytokinesis failure can lead to changes in cell fate or aneuploidy, which can be detrimental during development and/or can lead to cancer. However, our knowledge of the pathways that regulate RhoA during cytokinesis is limited, and the role of other Rho family GTPases is not clear. This is largely because the study of Rho GTPases presents unique challenges using traditional cell biological and biochemical methods, and they have pleiotropic functions making genetic studies difficult to interpret. The recent generation of optogenetic tools and biosensors that control and detect active Rho has overcome some of these challenges and is helping to elucidate the role of RhoA in cytokinesis. However, improvements are needed to reveal the role of other Rho GTPases in cytokinesis, and to identify the molecular mechanisms that control Rho activity. This review examines some of the outstanding questions in cytokinesis, and explores tools for the imaging and control of Rho GTPases.

Indexed as

Cytokinesisrho GTP-Binding ProteinsMitosisrho GTP-Binding ProteinsbiosensorscontractilitycytokinesisoptogeneticsRhoA

Identifiers

PMID34405757
PMCPMC9707540
OpenAlexW3195046745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.