Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34405553›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part A2021

Clan genomics: From OMIM phenotypic traits to genes and biology.

James R Lupski

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of medical genetics. Part A, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Optimizing genetic testing strategies for congenital anomalies in Iran.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A biallelic frameshift indel in PPP1R35 as a cause of primary microcephaly.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

James R LupskiDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9907-9246
Baylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

Baylor-Johns Hopkins Center for Mendelian GeneticsUM1HG006542 · NHGRI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI VALLE, DAVID · 2016 to 2020
$14.5M
Frequency of variants of unknown significance by ancestry groups in the All of Us Research Program cohortU01HG011758 · NHGRI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI RICHARD A GIBBS, JAMES R. LUPSKI · 2021 to 2026
$13.8M
STRUCTURAL VARIATION IN NEUROLOGICAL DISEASER35NS105078 · NINDS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LUPSKI, JAMES R. · 2018 to 2025
$6.0M
MUTATIONAL SIGNATURE(S) OF HUMAN GENOMIC REARRANGEMENT MECHANISMSR01GM106373 · NIGMS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI HASTINGS, PHILIP JOHN, LUPSKI, JAMES R. · 2014 to 2022
$3.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG011758NHGRI NIH HHS UM1 HG006542NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM106373NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS105078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical characterization of a patient phenotype has been the quintessential approach for elucidating a differential diagnosis and a hypothesis to explore a potential clinical diagnosis. This has resulted in a language of medicine and a semantic ontology, with both specialty- and subspecialty-specific lexicons, that can be challenging to translate and interpret. There is no 'Rosetta Stone' of clinical medicine such as the genetic code that can assist translation and interpretation of the language of genetics. Nevertheless, the information content embodied within a clinical diagnosis can guide management, therapeutic intervention, and potentially prognostic outlook of disease enabling anticipatory guidance for patients and families. Clinical genomics is now established firmly in medical practice. The granularity and informative content of a personal genome is immense. Yet, we are limited in our utility of much of that personal genome information by the lack of functional characterization of the overwhelming majority of computationally annotated genes in the haploid human reference genome sequence. Whereas DNA and the genetic code have provided a 'Rosetta Stone' to translate genetic variant information, clinical medicine, and clinical genomics provide the context to understand human biology and disease. A path forward will integrate deep phenotyping, such as available in a clinical synopsis in the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) entries, with personal genome analyses.

Indexed as

GenomicsComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticGenetic Diseases, InbornGenetics, MedicalHumansPhenotypefamily-based genomicsHPOnew mutationquantitative clinical phenotypingrare variantsSV mutagenesis

Identifiers

PMID34405553
PMCPMC8530976
OpenAlexW3193736606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.