ArticleJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2021
NBPF4 mitigates progression in colorectal cancer through the regulation of EZH2-associated ETFA.
Article in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Construction of a human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-related gene risk model for predicting breast cancer prognosis.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- RETRACTION: NBPF4 Mitigates Progression in Colorectal Cancer Through the Regulation of EZH2-Associated ETFA.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Article
- HSK3486 Inhibits Colorectal Cancer Growth by Promoting Oxidative Stress and ATPase Inhibitory Factor 1 Activation.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2024Article
- MiR-934 Exacerbates Malignancy of Gastric Cancer Cells by Targeting ZFP36.Iranian journal of public health · 2023Article
- Circ_0036412 affects the proliferation and cell cycle of hepatocellular carcinoma via hedgehog signaling pathway.Journal of translational medicine · 2022Article
- NBPF4 mitigates progression in colorectal cancer through the regulation of EZH2-associated ETFA.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Retracted
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of death worldwide, and hence, there is a need to elucidate the molecular mechanisms contributing to the progression of CRC. In this study, we aimed at assessing the role of long non-coding RNA NBPF4 on the tumorigenesis of CRC. Silencing or overexpression experiments were performed on HCT116 and SW260 in vitro models. BALB/c athymic female nude mice aged 5-6 weeks were used as in vivo models. To assess the relationship between NBPF4 and its regulatory RNA pull-down assay, RNA immunoprecipitation, luciferase activity, Western blotting and qRT-PCR were employed. Initially, we identified that NBPF4 was downregulated in CRC tissues and cell lines. Furthermore, we observed that NBPF4 decreased tumorigenesis in both in vitro and in vivo models. Additionally, we identified that ETFA was highly expressed in CRCs and was negatively associated with NBPF4. Subsequently, we identified that EZH2, a transcriptional factor, activated ETFA by enhancing the methylation of its promoter, and EZH2 was also highly regulated in CRCs. Using COAD and READ databases, we confirmed that EZH2 and ETFA were positively correlated. Furthermore, we identified NBPF4 and EZH2 were targets for ZFP36, which bound and positively regulated NBPF4. This prevented NBPF4 from binding to its negative regulator miR-17-3p. Our results demonstrated that NBPF4 downregulated EZH2 and stabilized itself by binding to ZFP36, thus escaping from inhibition by miR-17-3p, which allowed mitigation of CRC through inhibition of ETFA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.