Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34405379›Full record

ArticleLearning & behavior2021

Another look at the extinction of conditioned flavor preferences: Amount of training and tests for spontaneous recovery.

Andrew R Delamater, Norman Tu, Jasmine Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning & behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrew R DelamaterPsychology Department, Brooklyn College - CUNY, 2900 Bedford Ave, Brooklyn, New York, 11210, USA. andrewd@brooklyn.cuny.edu.
Norman TuPsychology Department, Brooklyn College - CUNY, 2900 Bedford Ave, Brooklyn, New York, 11210, USA.
Jasmine HuangPsychology Department, Brooklyn College - CUNY, 2900 Bedford Ave, Brooklyn, New York, 11210, USA.

Funding

A Multi-Component Approach to Extinction in Pavlovian LearningSC1DA034995 · NIDA · BROOKLYN COLLEGE · PI DELAMATER, ANDREW · 2012 to 2015
$1.6M
NIDA NIH HHS SC1 DA034995
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A conditioned flavor preference develops when hungry or thirsty rats experience a neutral flavor mixed in solution with a nutrient. In two sets of studies, we previously demonstrated that this learned preference is highly sensitive to flavor nonreinforcement (i.e., exposure to the flavor without the nutrient) either prior to (latent inhibition), during (partial reinforcement), or following (extinction) flavor-nutrient pairings. In each of these studies we employed a nutrient devaluation procedure to assess the integrity of specific flavor-nutrient associations following extinction, but more recently Gonzalez, Morillas, and Hall (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning & Cognition, 42, 380-390, 2016) observed that sensitivity to extinction in thirsty rats in this preparation may depend upon use of a post-conditioning nutrient devaluation procedure. To assess the generality of our earlier results, but without including a post-conditioning nutrient devaluation phase, we assessed in three experiments the role of the number of flavor-nutrient pairings given prior to extinction and the possibility of spontaneous recovery following a 3-week delay. We observed that extinction consistently weakened the flavor preference in thirsty rats (in spite of the absence of a nutrient devaluation procedure) and also found no evidence for spontaneous recovery. These results establish that our prior findings that conditioned flavor preferences are weakened by extinction are quite robust in thirsty rats and that these extinction effects may be fairly permanent.

Indexed as

Conditioning, PsychologicalFood PreferencesAnimalsHungerRatsReinforcement, PsychologyTasteExtinctionFlavor preference learningSpontaneous recovery

Identifiers

PMID34405379
PMCPMC8604786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.