Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34405336›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of behavioral medicine2022

The Nocebo Effect: A Review of Contemporary Experimental Research.

Branka Bagarić, Nataša Jokić-Begić, Claire Sangster Jokić

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of behavioral medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Risk factors associated with nocebo effects: A review of reviews.Brain, behavior, & immunity - health · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Branka BagarićCroatian Association for Behavioral-Cognitive Therapies (CABCT), Šenoina 25, 10 000, Zagreb, Croatia. branka.bagaric1@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1786-0993
Nataša Jokić-BegićDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb, Ivana Lučića 3, 10 000, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2597-535X
Claire Sangster JokićDepartment of Occupational Therapy, University of Applied Health Sciences, Mlinarska 38, 10 000, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0306-9815

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNocebo effect, the occurrence of adverse symptoms fallowing an inactive treatment, is much less understood than its opposite, placebo effect. This systematic review of contemporary studies exploring the nocebo effect focuses on (1) the mechanisms underlying the nocebo effect, (2) the characteristics of participants exhibiting a more intensive nocebo response, and (3) the circumstances that might reduce or prevent the nocebo effect.

methodWe included experimental nocebo studies published in English that examined the occurrence of nocebo in various domains (i.e., types of sensations and symptoms) and different levels of nocebo response (e.g., performance, self-assessment) and in different populations of participants (healthy and clinical). Using Web of Science, PsycInfo and PubMed, we identified 25 papers (35 studies) that met our criteria with a total of N = 2614 participants, mostly healthy volunteers.

resultsNocebo was invoked by manipulating expectations, conditioning or both. A narrative content synthesis was conducted. Nocebo was successfully invoked in a range of domains (e.g., pain, nausea, itch, skin dryness) and levels (sensory, affective, psychological, and behavioral). Various characteristics of the conditioning procedure and participants' emotions, expectations, and dispositions are found to be related to the nocebo response, which sheds insight into the possible mechanisms of the nocebo effect. Strategies successful and unsuccessful in diminishing the nocebo response are identified. Limitations of this review include a small sample of studies.

conclusionThese findings point to the universality of nocebo as well as to the importance of participant characteristics and experimental circumstances in invoking the nocebo effect. Further research should examine the nocebo effect in clinical populations.

Indexed as

Nocebo EffectPlacebo EffectHealthy VolunteersHumansPainPruritusNoceboNocebo mechanismsNocebo risk factorsReducing and preventing noceboSystematic review

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.