Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34405319›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2021

In Silico Hemodynamics and Filtering Evaluation of a Commercial Embolic Protection Device.

Antonio Gil, Pedro Quintero, Andrea Mares, Juan Ribera de Serra, Manuel Ignacio Sánchez-Nevárez, Manuel Miralles

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 86% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Antonio GilCMT-Motores Térmicos, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera, s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain.
Pedro QuinteroCMT-Motores Térmicos, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera, s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain. pedquiig@mot.upv.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4373-2079
Andrea MaresCMT-Motores Térmicos, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera, s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain.
Juan Ribera de SerraInstituto de Restauración del Patrimonio, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera, s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain.
Manuel Ignacio Sánchez-NevárezServicio de Angiología y Cirugía Vascular, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Avinguda de Fernando Abril Martorell, 106, 46026, Valencia, Spain.
Manuel MirallesServicio de Angiología y Cirugía Vascular, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Avinguda de Fernando Abril Martorell, 106, 46026, Valencia, Spain.
Universitat Politècnica de València · ESHospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ES

Funding

upv-la fe 2020 subprograma proyectos de innovación DPECFD
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the last years, several kinds of Embolic Protection Devices (EPD) have been developed, with the aim of minimizing complication caused by thrombi generated during Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS). These devices are capable of capturing small particles generated during the intervention, avoiding cerebral stroke and improving the outcomes of the surgery. However, they have associated complications, like the increase on flow resistance associated by their use or the lack of knowledge on their actual filtration efficiency for thrombi of low size. Current work proposes a validated computational methodology in order to predict the hemodynamic features and filtering efficiency of a commercial EPD. It will be observed how Computational Fluid Dynamics predicts pressure drop with fair agreement with the experimental measurements. Finally, this work analyzes the filtration efficiency and the influence of the distribution of injected particles on this parameter. The capabilities of the filter for retaining particles of diameter below the pore size is, additionally, discussed.

Indexed as

Embolic Protection DevicesComputer SimulationFiltrationHemodynamicsHydrodynamicsComputational fluid dynamicsDiscrete element methodEmbolic protection deviceFiltration efficiencyHemodynamics

Identifiers

PMID34405319
OpenAlexW3195440976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.