Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34405280›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2021

Density assessment and reporting for Phlebotomus perniciosus and other sand fly species in periurban residential estates in Spain.

C Muñoz, J Risueño, P Pérez-Cutillas, L J Bernal, J M Ortiz, R Ruiz de Ybáñez, P F Sánchez-López, C Martínez-Carrasco, L Del Río, P De la Rúa and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

C MuñozDepartamento de Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum", Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain. clara.munoz1@um.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9847-8616
J RisueñoDepartamento de Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum", Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5006-7738
P Pérez-CutillasDepartamento de Geografía, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1271-3895
L J BernalDepartamento de Medicina Y Cirugía Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum", Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3648-7012
J M OrtizDepartamento de Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum", Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0889-2985
R Ruiz de YbáñezDepartamento de Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum", Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1402-8023
P F Sánchez-LópezServicio de Sanidad Ambiental, Dirección General de Salud Pública Y Adicciones, Consejería de Salud de La Región de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1712-2576
C Martínez-CarrascoDepartamento de Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum", Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8742-0109
L Del RíoDepartamento de Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum", Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4719-8926
P De la RúaÁrea de Biología Animal, Departamento de Zoología Y Antropología Física, Facultad de Veterinaria, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum", Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0058-1402
J D García-MartínezDepartamento de Medicina Y Cirugía Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum", Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4209-0107
M GonzálvezDepartamento de Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum", Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0423-3189
L MurciaDepartamento de Genética Y Microbiología, Facultad de Medicina, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum", Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7768-0989
F CollantesDepartamento de Zoología Y Antropología Física, Facultad de Biología, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum", Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8085-6399
E GoyenaDepartamento de Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum", Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8993-2792
T SpitzovaDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Vinicna 7, 128 44, Prague 2, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2028-3530
S ElshanatDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1649-3228
E BerriatuaDepartamento de Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Regional Campus of International Excellence "Campus Mare Nostrum", Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0721-8091

Funding

Fundación Séneca 19908/GERM/15Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation AGL2013-46981-R
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Green periurban residential areas in Mediterranean countries have flourished in the last decades and become foci for leishmaniasis. To remedy the absence of information on vector ecology in these environments, we examined phlebotomine sand fly distribution in 29 sites in Murcia City over a 3-year period, including the plots of 20 detached houses and nine non-urbanized sites nearby. We collected 5,066 specimens from five species using "sticky" interception and light attraction traps. The relative frequency of the main Leishmania infantum vector Phlebotomus perniciosus in these traps was 32% and 63%, respectively. Sand fly density was widely variable spatially and temporally and greatest in non-urbanized sites, particularly in caves and abandoned buildings close to domestic animal holdings. Phlebotomus perniciosus density in house plots was positively correlated with those in non-urbanized sites, greatest in larger properties with extensive vegetation and non-permanently lived, but not associated to dog presence or a history of canine leishmaniasis. Within house plots, sand fly density was highest in traps closest to walls. Furthermore, the study provides a guideline for insect density assessment and reporting and is envisioned as a building block towards the development of a pan-European database for robust investigation of environmental determinants of sand fly distribution.

Indexed as

Leishmania infantumLeishmaniasisPhlebotomusPsychodidaeAnimalsDogsFemaleInsect VectorsMaleSpainDensityDistributionEnvironmentLeishmaniaPhlebotomusResidential

Identifiers

PMID34405280
PMCPMC8397643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.