ArticleBioprocess and biosystems engineering2021
Development and validation of a label-free method for measuring the collagen hydrolytic activity of protease.
Article in Bioprocess and biosystems engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Collagen is the most abundant fibrous structural protein, and therefore, the quantitative evaluation of the effect of protease on collagen has a profound influence on enzyme application. In this research, unlabeled native bovine hide powder was utilized to detect collagen hydrolytic activity of the protease. The optimum conditions of the determination method were as follows: 30 mg/mL substrate concentration, 30 min reaction time, and 2-9 U/mL enzyme concentration. Then, several typical industrial protease preparations were chosen to measure collagenolytic activities at different temperatures and pH values, whose change trends were quite distinct from those of proteolytic activity assay method based on casein or dye-labeled hide powder substrate. Especially, in the pH 5-7, casein hydrolytic activities of these proteases showed sharper peaks with relative activity from 6% to 100%, whereas, their collagen hydrolytic activities based on native hide powder exhibited 30-100% with broader peaks. And collagen hydrolytic activities resulted from using dye-labeled substrate reached a lower optimum pH value than that of other methods. Besides, the results of these measurements displayed a moderate degree of reproducibility. This method is more reasonable than the protease assay method using casein or labeled hide powder as the substrate in many fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.