Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34404873›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2021

Efficacy and safety of primary, early and late needle-knife fistulotomy for biliary access.

Jorge Canena, Luís Lopes, João Fernandes, Gonçalo Alexandrino, Luísa Figueiredo, Marta Moreira, Tarcísio Araújo, Luís Lourenço, David Horta, Pietro Familiari and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Precut fistulotomy made easy!Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jorge Canena *Department of Gastroenterology, Professor Doutor Fernando Fonseca Hospital, IC 19 PT-2720-276, Amadora, Portugal. jmtcanena@live.com.pt.
Luís Lopes *Department of Gastroenterology, Santa Luzia Hospital, Unidade Local de Saúde Alto Minho, Viana do Castelo, Portugal.
João FernandesDepartment of Gastroenterology, Santa Luzia Hospital, Unidade Local de Saúde Alto Minho, Viana do Castelo, Portugal.
Gonçalo AlexandrinoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Professor Doutor Fernando Fonseca Hospital, IC 19 PT-2720-276, Amadora, Portugal.
Luísa FigueiredoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Professor Doutor Fernando Fonseca Hospital, IC 19 PT-2720-276, Amadora, Portugal.
Marta MoreiraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Santa Luzia Hospital, Unidade Local de Saúde Alto Minho, Viana do Castelo, Portugal.
Tarcísio AraújoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Santa Luzia Hospital, Unidade Local de Saúde Alto Minho, Viana do Castelo, Portugal.
Luís LourençoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Professor Doutor Fernando Fonseca Hospital, IC 19 PT-2720-276, Amadora, Portugal.
David HortaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Professor Doutor Fernando Fonseca Hospital, IC 19 PT-2720-276, Amadora, Portugal.
Pietro FamiliariDigestive Endoscopy Unit, Agostino Gemelli University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Mário Dinis-RibeiroDepartment of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Hospital Prof. Dr. Fernando Fonseca · PTAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITInstituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil · PTUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PTUniversity of Minho · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommends needle-knife fistulotomy (NKF) as the preferred precut technique. However, there is little information on whether NKF performed at different times is associated with different success and adverse event rates. We compared the outcomes of 3 different timings of NKF. This was an observational study conducted at 4 institutions and this was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. We included 330 consecutive patients submitted to NKF attempt for biliary access. Patients were divided into three groups: NKF as an initial procedure for biliary access (group A, n = 121); early NKF defined as after 5 min, 5 attempts, or 2 pancreatic passages (group B, n = 99); and late NKF: after at least 10 min of unsuccessful standard biliary cannulation (group C, n = 110). We assessed the success rate of biliary cannulation at initial ERCP, time to perform NKF until biliary cannulation, overall biliary cannulation rate (second ERCP when initial failure), adverse event rate, and predictors of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). The initial cannulation rate was 98%, 91% and 94% for groups A, B and C respectively, p = 0.08, whereas overall biliary cannulation rate was 100%, 95% and 98%, p = 0.115. The adverse event rate/PEP was 4.1%/2.5%, 7.1%/4% and 10.9%/8.2%, for groups A, B and C respectively, (p = 0.197 and p = 0.190). Median time for creating the fistula was A = 4.0 min, B = 3.2 min, and C = 5.6 min, p < 000.1. Each additional minute spent attempting cannulation increased the odds ratio (OR) for PEP by 1.072, and patients with 3 or more risk factors for pancreatitis had a higher chance of PEP. In conclusion, the timing of NFK does not appear to influence success rates but late NFK is associated with a higher time to create a fistula and an increased risk of pancreatitis. Primary NFK is associated with a high rate of success and a low rate of PEP and deserves additional investigation.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiliary Tract Surgical ProceduresCatheterizationCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34404873
PMCPMC8371017
OpenAlexW3195288231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.