Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34404868›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Antibiotic-resistant bacteria, antibiotic resistance genes, and antibiotic residues in wastewater from a poultry slaughterhouse after conventional and advanced treatments.

Mykhailo Savin, Johannes Alexander, Gabriele Bierbaum, Jens Andre Hammerl, Norman Hembach, Thomas Schwartz, Ricarda Maria Schmithausen, Esther Sib, Alexander Voigt, Judith Kreyenschmidt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Antimicrobial Resistance in SelectedAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Impact and Diversity of ESBL-ProducingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. [Therapy-relevant antibiotic resistances in a One Health context].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mykhailo SavinInstitute for Hygiene and Public Health, Medical Faculty, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany. m.savin@uni-bonn.de.
Johannes AlexanderDepartment of Microbiology/Molecular Biology, Institute of Functional Interfaces (IFG), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
Gabriele BierbaumInstitute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, Medical Faculty, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Jens Andre HammerlDepartment for Biological Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany.
Norman HembachDepartment of Microbiology/Molecular Biology, Institute of Functional Interfaces (IFG), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
Thomas SchwartzDepartment of Microbiology/Molecular Biology, Institute of Functional Interfaces (IFG), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
Ricarda Maria SchmithausenInstitute for Hygiene and Public Health, Medical Faculty, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Esther SibInstitute for Hygiene and Public Health, Medical Faculty, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Alexander VoigtInstitute for Hygiene and Public Health, Medical Faculty, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Judith KreyenschmidtInstitute of Animal Sciences, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Slaughterhouse wastewater is considered a reservoir for antibiotic-resistant bacteria and antibiotic residues, which are not sufficiently removed by conventional treatment processes. This study focuses on the occurrence of ESKAPE bacteria (Enterococcus spp., S. aureus, K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa, Enterobacter spp.), ESBL (extended-spectrum β-lactamase)-producing E. coli, antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) and antibiotic residues in wastewater from a poultry slaughterhouse. The efficacy of conventional and advanced treatments (i.e., ozonation) of the in-house wastewater treatment plant regarding their removal was also evaluated. Target culturable bacteria were detected only in the influent and effluent after conventional treatment. High abundances of genes (e.g., bla

Indexed as

PoultryAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrug ResiduesDrug Resistance, BacterialWastewaterWater MicrobiologyWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnti-Bacterial AgentsWastewaterWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID34404868
PMCPMC8371126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.