Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34404804›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Parallel adaptation in autopolyploid Arabidopsis arenosa is dominated by repeated recruitment of shared alleles.

Veronika Konečná, Sian Bray, Jakub Vlček, Magdalena Bohutínská, Doubravka Požárová, Rimjhim Roy Choudhury, Anita Bollmann-Giolai, Paulina Flis, David E Salt, Christian Parisod and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Convergence and parallelism in the evolution of plant metabolism.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Whole-genome duplication increases genetic diversity and load in outcrossingProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Veronika KonečnáDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-9568-342X
Sian BrayFuture Food Beacon and School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Jakub VlčekDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-2174-9374
Magdalena BohutínskáDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Doubravka PožárováDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Rimjhim Roy ChoudhuryInstitute of Plant Sciences, University of Berne, Bern, Switzerland.
Anita Bollmann-GiolaiJohn Innes Centre (JIC), Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4398-7509
Paulina FlisFuture Food Beacon and School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5529-7599
David E SaltFuture Food Beacon and School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0283-0991
Christian ParisodInstitute of Plant Sciences, University of Berne, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8798-0897
Levi YantFuture Food Beacon and School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. levi.yant@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3442-0217
Filip KolářDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. filip.kolar@natur.cuni.cz.ORCID 0000-0002-8793-7992
Charles University · CZUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Bern · CHJohn Innes Centre · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Relative contributions of pre-existing vs de novo genomic variation to adaptation are poorly understood, especially in polyploid organisms. We assess this in high resolution using autotetraploid Arabidopsis arenosa, which repeatedly adapted to toxic serpentine soils that exhibit skewed elemental profiles. Leveraging a fivefold replicated serpentine invasion, we assess selection on SNPs and structural variants (TEs) in 78 resequenced individuals and discover significant parallelism in candidate genes involved in ion homeostasis. We further model parallel selection and infer repeated sweeps on a shared pool of variants in nearly all these loci, supporting theoretical expectations. A single striking exception is represented by TWO PORE CHANNEL 1, which exhibits convergent evolution from independent de novo mutations at an identical, otherwise conserved site at the calcium channel selectivity gate. Taken together, this suggests that polyploid populations can rapidly adapt to environmental extremes, calling on both pre-existing variation and novel polymorphisms.

Indexed as

AllelesGenome, PlantPolyploidyAdaptation, PhysiologicalArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsCalcium ChannelsMutationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSecologanin Tryptamine AlkaloidsSoilTwo-Pore ChannelsArabidopsis ProteinsCalcium ChannelsSecologanin Tryptamine Alkaloidsserpentine (alkaloid)SoilTPC1 protein, ArabidopsisTwo-Pore Channels

Identifiers

PMID34404804
PMCPMC8370997
OpenAlexW3195649790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.