ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2021
Different approaches to making and testing change in healthcare.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Challenges for implementing generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) into clinical healthcare.Internal medicine journal · 2025Review
- Exploring a Co-Designed Approach for Healthcare Quality Improvement-Learning Through Developmental Evaluation.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Improving complex systems with improve-mentation: challenges and solutions.Frontiers in health services · 2025Article
- An opportunity to sleep well in hospital: development of a multi-level intervention to improve inpatient sleep (ASLEEP) using behaviour change theories.BMC psychology · 2024Article
- Enhancing Outcomes and Efficiency in Large Epidermal Cyst Management: Quality Improvement Approach in Primary Care.Clinics and practice · 2024Article
- Applying cognitive walkthrough methodology to improve the usability of an equity-focused implementation strategy.Implementation science communications · 2024Article
- Using Theories, Models, and Frameworks to Inform Implementation Cycles of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems in Tertiary Health Care Settings: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Fragility Fracture Network: innovations in healthcare improvement.BMJ open quality · 2023Article
- Beyond Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle - staff perceptions on facilitators and barriers to the implementation of telepresence robots in long-term care.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Article
- Sustaining improvement of hospital-wide initiative for patient safety and quality: a systematic scoping review.BMJ open quality · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.