ArticleTrials2021
Efficacy and safety of secukinumab in patients with giant cell arteritis: study protocol for a randomized, parallel group, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial.
Article in Trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03765788 (A Randomized, Parallel-group, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Phase 2 Trial to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of Secukinumab), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Parallel-group, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Phase 2 Trial to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of Secukinumab (AIN457) in Patients With Giant Cell Arteritis (TitAIN)
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optic nerve sheath measurement to monitor disease activity in giant cell arteritis: a pilot study.Clinical rheumatology · 2024Article
- Giant Cell Arteritis: Advances in Understanding Pathogenesis and Implications for Clinical Practice.Cells · 2024Review
- Novel and potential future therapeutic options in systemic autoimmune diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Advances and challenges in management of large vessel vasculitis.Rheumatology and immunology research · 2023Article
- Disease stratification in GCA and PMR: state of the art and future perspectives.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2023Review
- Observational
- Human monocyte-derived suppressive cells (HuMoSC) for cell therapy in giant cell arteritis.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Vasculitis distribution and clinical characteristics in giant cell arteritis: a retrospective study using the new 2022 ACR/EULAR classification criteria.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- The IL-17 pathway as a target in giant cell arteritis.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- New Insights into the Pathogenesis of Giant Cell Arteritis: Mechanisms Involved in Maintaining Vascular Inflammation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Advances in the Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Review
- The Th17 Pathway in Vascular Inflammation: Culprit or Consort?Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Vasculitogenic T Cells in Large Vessel Vasculitis.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOne key pathological finding in giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the presence of interferon-gamma and interleukin (IL)-17 producing T helper (Th) 1 and Th17 cells in affected arteries. There is anecdotal evidence of successful induction and maintenance of remission with the monoclonal anti-IL-17A antibody secukinumab. Inhibition of IL-17A could therefore represent a potential new therapeutic option for the treatment of GCA.
methodsThis is a randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center, phase II study in which patients, treating physicians, and the associated clinical staff as well as the sponsor clinical team are blinded. It is designed to evaluate efficacy and safety of secukinumab compared to placebo in combination with an open-label prednisolone taper regimen. Patients included are naïve to biological therapy and have newly diagnosed or relapsing GCA. Fifty patients are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 300 mg secukinumab or placebo subcutaneously at baseline, weeks 1, 2 and 3, and every 4 weeks from week 4. Patients in both treatment arms receive a 26-week prednisolone taper regimen. The study consists of a maximum 6-week screening period, a 52-week treatment period (including the 26-week tapering), and an 8-week safety follow-up, with primary and secondary endpoint assessments at week 28. Patients who do not achieve remission by week 12 experience a flare after remission or cannot adhere to the prednisolone tapering will enter the escape arm and receive prednisolone at a dose determined by the investigator's clinical judgment. The blinded treatment is continued. Two optional imaging sub-studies are included (ultrasound and contrast-media enhanced magnetic resonance angiography [MRA]) to assess vessel wall inflammation and occlusion before and after treatment. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients in sustained remission until week 28 in the secukinumab group compared to the proportion of patients in the placebo group. A Bayesian approach is applied. DISCUSSION: The trial design allows the first placebo-controlled data collection on the efficacy and safety of secukinumab in patients with GCA.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03765788 . Registration on 5 December 2018, prospective registration, EudraCT number 2018-002610-12; clinical trial protocol number CAIN457ADE11C.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.