ArticleJournal of hematology & oncology2021
Making clinical decisions based on measurable residual disease improves the outcome in multiple myeloma.
Article in Journal of hematology & oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Clinical implications of minimal residual disease monitoring in multiple myeloma.International journal of hematology · 2026Review
- Evidence for the Monitoring of Minimal Residual Disease Dynamics to Guide Clinical Practice in Patients with Multiple Myeloma.Targeted oncology · 2026Review
- Community hematologist/oncologist perspectives on minimal residual disease testing in patients with multiple myeloma.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Opportunities and challenges for MRD assessment in the clinical management of multiple myeloma.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Blood Plasma Methylated DNA Markers in the Detection of Lymphoma: Discovery, Validation, and Clinical Pilot.American journal of hematology · 2025Article
- Total marrow irradiation as part of autologous stem cell transplantation for patients with multiple myeloma.Annals of hematology · 2025Article
- Multiple Myeloma Experiences and Preferences: A Mixed Methods Study of Patients and Care Partners in the United States.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- High-Sensitivity Flow Cytometry for the Reliable Detection of Measurable Residual Disease in Hematological Malignancies in Clinical Laboratories.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Evaluation of next-generation sequencing versus next-generation flow cytometry for minimal-residual-disease detection in Chinese patients with multiple myeloma.Discover oncology · 2024Article
- Quantification of Measurable Residual Disease Detection by Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Clonality Testing in B-Cell and Plasma Cell Neoplasms.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2024Article
- Real-world prognostic significance of attaining minimal residual disease negativity in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.Discover oncology · 2024Article
- Contribution of post-transplantation therapy to sustained MRD negativity in multiple myeloma: a retrospective analysis.International journal of hematology · 2024Article
- New Developments in Myeloma Treatment and Response Assessment.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023Article
- Measurable Residual Disease Testing in Multiple Myeloma Routine Clinical Practice: A Modified Delphi Study.HemaSphere · 2023Article
- Review
- Dynamic monitoring of myeloma minimal residual disease with targeted mass spectrometry.Blood cancer journal · 2023Article
- Editorial: Risk factors in multiple myeloma identified before and during treatment: are we ready to personalize treatment?Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Next-generation sequencing for MRD monitoring in B-lineage malignancies: from bench to bedside.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2022Review
- Clinician survey regarding measurable residual disease-guided decision-making in multiple myeloma.Blood cancer journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The assessment of measurable residual disease (MRD) in bone marrow has proven of prognostic relevance in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Nevertheless, and unlike other hematologic malignancies, the use of MRD results to make clinical decisions in MM has been underexplored to date. In this retrospective study, we present the results from a multinational and multicenter series of 400 patients with MRD monitoring during front-line therapy with the aim of exploring how clinical decisions made based on those MRD results affected outcomes. As expected, achievement of MRD negativity at any point was associated with improved PFS versus persistent MRD positivity (median PFS 104 vs. 45 months, p < 0.0001). In addition, however, 67 out of 400 patients underwent a clinical decision (treatment discontinuation, intensification or initiation of a new therapy) based on MRD results. Those patients in whom a treatment change was made showed a prolonged PFS in comparison with those 333 patients in which MRD results were not acted upon (respectively, mPFS 104 vs. 62 months, p = 0.005). In patients who achieved MRD negativity during maintenance (n = 186) on at least one occasion, stopping therapy in 24 patients vs. continuing in 162 did not alter PFS (mPFS 120 months vs. 82 months, p = 0.1). Most importantly, however, in patients with a positive MRD during maintenance (n = 214), a clinical decision (either intensification or change of therapy) (n = 43) resulted in better PFS compared to patients in whom no adjustment was made (n = 171) (mPFS NA vs. 39 months, p = 0.02). Interestingly, there were no significant differences when MRD was assessed by flow cytometry or by next-generation sequencing. Herein, we find that MRD is useful in guiding clinical decisions during initial therapy and has a positive impact on PFS in MM patients. This potentially opens a new dimension for the use of MRD in MM, but this role still remains to be confirmed in prospective, randomized clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.