Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34404408›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Association between post-hospital clinic and telephone follow-up provider visits with 30-day readmission risk in an integrated health system.

Huong Q Nguyen, Aileen Baecker, Timothy Ho, Dan N Huynh, Heather L Watson, Jing Li, Ernest Shen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Huong Q NguyenDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Research and Evaluation, 100 S. Los Robles Avenue, 2nd Floor, Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA. huong.q2.nguyen@kp.org.
Aileen BaeckerDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Research and Evaluation, 100 S. Los Robles Avenue, 2nd Floor, Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA.
Timothy HoKaiser Permanente Southern California, Regional Clinical Operations, Pasadena, USA.
Dan N HuynhKaiser Permanente Southern California, Regional Clinical Operations, Pasadena, USA.
Heather L WatsonKaiser Permanente Southern California, Regional Clinical Operations, Pasadena, USA.
Jing LiUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, USA.
Ernest ShenDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Research and Evaluation, 100 S. Los Robles Avenue, 2nd Floor, Pasadena, CA, 91101, USA.
Kaiser Permanente · USUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollow-up visits with clinic providers after hospital discharge may not be feasible for some patients due to functional limitations, transportation challenges, need for physical distancing, or fear of exposure especially during the current COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsThe aim of the study was to determine the effects of post-hospital clinic (POSH) and telephone (TPOSH) follow-up provider visits versus no visit on 30-day readmission. We used a retrospective cohort design based on data from 1/1/2017 to 12/31/2019 on adult patients (n = 213,513) discharged home from 15 Kaiser Permanente Southern California hospitals. Completion of POSH or TPOSH provider visits within 7 days of discharge was the exposure and all-cause 30-day inpatient and observation stay readmission was the primary outcome. We used matching weights to balance the groups and Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model to assess for readmission risk.

resultsUnweighted all-cause 30-day readmission rate was highest for patients who completed a TPOSH (17.3%) followed by no visit (14.2%), non-POSH (evaluation and management visits that were not focused on the hospitalization: 13.6%) and POSH (12.6%) visits. The matching weighted models showed that the effects of POSH and TPOSH visits varied across patient subgroups. For high risk (LACE 11+) medicine patients, both POSH (HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.71, 0.85, P < .001) and TPOSH (HR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.83, 0.99, P = .03) were associated with 23 and 9% lower risk of 30-day readmission, respectively, compared to no visit. For medium to low risk medicine patients (LACE< 11) and all surgical patients regardless of LACE score or age, there were no significant associations for either visit type with risk of 30-day readmission.

conclusionsPost-hospital telephone follow-up provider visits had only modest effects on 30-day readmission in high-risk medicine patients compared to clinic visits. It remains to be determined if greater use and comfort with virtual visits by providers and patients as a result of the pandemic might improve the effectiveness of these encounters.

Indexed as

COVID-19Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedAdultFollow-Up StudiesHospitalsHumansPandemicsPatient DischargePatient ReadmissionRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2TelephoneCare transitionPost-discharge provider follow-upReadmission

Identifiers

PMID34404408
PMCPMC8367769
OpenAlexW3193928228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.