Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34404377›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Risk perception of COVID-19 among sub-Sahara Africans: a web-based comparative survey of local and diaspora residents.

Emmanuel Kwasi Abu, Richard Oloruntoba, Uchechukwu Levi Osuagwu, Dipesh Bhattarai, Chundung Asabe Miner, Piwuna Christopher Goson, Raymond Langsi, Obinna Nwaeze, Timothy G Chikasirimobi, Godwin O Ovenseri-Ogbomo and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 12 institutions in 8 countries.

Emmanuel Kwasi AbuDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, School of Allied Health Sciences, University of Cape Coast, 00233, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Richard OloruntobaSchool of Management and Marketing, Faculty of Business and Law, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, 6151, Australia.
Uchechukwu Levi OsuagwuTranslational Health Research Institute (THRI), School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, 2560, Australia. l.osuagwu@westernsydney.edu.au.
Dipesh BhattaraiFaculty of Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Chundung Asabe MinerDepartment of Community Medicine, College of Health Sciences, University of Jos, Jos, Nigeria.
Piwuna Christopher GosonDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Health Sciences, University of Jos, Jos, Nigeria.
Raymond LangsiHealth Division, University of Bamenda Bambili, Bamenda, Cameroon.
Obinna NwaezeCounty Durham and Darlington National Health Service (NHS) Foundation, Darlington, DL3 0PD, UK.
Timothy G ChikasirimobiDepartment of Optometry and Vision Sciences, School of Public Health, Biomedical Sciences and Technology, Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kakamega, 50100, Kenya.
Godwin O Ovenseri-OgbomoDiscipline of Optometry, School of Health Sciences, African Vision Research Institute (AVRI), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Westville Campus, Durban, 3629, South Africa.
Bernadine N EkpenyongDiscipline of Optometry, School of Health Sciences, African Vision Research Institute (AVRI), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Westville Campus, Durban, 3629, South Africa.
Deborah Donald CharweTanzania Food and Nutrition Center, P. O. Box 977, Dar-es Salaam, Tanzania.
Khathutshelo Percy MashigeDiscipline of Optometry, School of Health Sciences, African Vision Research Institute (AVRI), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Westville Campus, Durban, 3629, South Africa.
Tanko IshayaDepartment of Computer Science, University of Jos, Jos, Nigeria.
Kingsley Emwinyore AghoDiscipline of Optometry, School of Health Sciences, African Vision Research Institute (AVRI), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Westville Campus, Durban, 3629, South Africa.
University of Jos · NGUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal · ZAAfrica Health Research Institute · ZACamden and Campbelltown Hospitals · AUCounty Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust · GBCurtin University · AUDeakin University · AUMasinde Muliro University of Science and Technology · KETanzania Food and Nutrition Center · TZTranslational Research Institute · AUUniversity of Bamenda · CMUniversity of Cape Coast · GH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerceived risk towards the coronavirus pandemic is key to improved compliance with public health measures to reduce the infection rates. This study investigated how Sub-Saharan Africans (SSA) living in their respective countries and those in the diaspora perceive their risk of getting infected by the COVID-19 virus as well as the associated factors.

methodsA web-based cross-sectional survey on 1969 participants aged 18 years and above (55.1% male) was conducted between April 27th and May 17th 2020, corresponding to the mandatory lockdown in most SSA countries. The dependent variable was the perception of risk for contracting COVID-19 scores. Independent variables included demographic characteristics, and COVID-19 related knowledge and attitude scores. Univariate and multiple linear regression analyses identified the factors associated with risk perception towards COVID-19.

resultsAmong the respondents, majority were living in SSA (n = 1855, 92.8%) and 143 (7.2%) in the diaspora. There was no significant difference in the mean risk perception scores between the two groups (p = 0.117), however, those aged 18-28 years had lower risk perception scores (p = 0.003) than the older respondents, while those who were employed (p = 0.040) and had higher levels of education (p < 0.001) had significantly higher risk perception scores than other respondents. After adjusting for covariates, multivariable analyses revealed that SSA residents aged 39-48 years (adjusted coefficient, β = 0.06, 95% CI [0.01, 1.19]) and health care sector workers (β = 0.61, 95% CI [0.09, 1.14]) reported a higher perceived risk of COVID-19. Knowledge and attitude scores increased as perceived risk for COVID-19 increased for both SSAs in Africa (β = 1.19, 95% CI [1.05, 1.34] for knowledge; β = 0.63, 95% CI [0.58, 0.69] for attitude) and in Diaspora (β = 1.97, 95% CI [1.16, 2.41] for knowledge; β = 0.30, 95% CI [0.02, 0.58] for attitude).

conclusionsThere is a need to promote preventive measures focusing on increasing people's knowledge about COVID-19 and encouraging positive attitudes towards the mitigation measures such as vaccines and education. Such interventions should target the younger population, less educated and non-healthcare workers.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdolescentAdultAfrica South of the SaharaCommunicable Disease ControlCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHuman MigrationHumansInternetMalePerceptionSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAfricaCOVID-19DiasporaKnowledgeLockdownPandemicRisk perceptionSub-Sahara Africa

Identifiers

PMID34404377
PMCPMC8370831
OpenAlexW3194448995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.