Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34404367›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2021

Comparative study of Amsel's criteria and Nugent scoring for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in a tertiary care hospital, Nepal.

Rajshree Bhujel, Shyam Kumar Mishra, Santosh Kumar Yadav, Kesang Diki Bista, Keshab Parajuli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Spatial organization ofInfection and immunity · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Bacterial vaginosis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rajshree BhujelDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal. bhujelrajshree@iom.edu.np.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2510-7966
Shyam Kumar MishraDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3888-7319
Santosh Kumar YadavDepartment of Microbiology, Rajarshi Janak University, Janakpurdham, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1392-155X
Kesang Diki BistaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Keshab ParajuliDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital · NP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe most common pathological cause of abnormal vaginal discharge in reproductive-aged women is bacterial vaginosis (BV). Amsel's criteria and Nugent scoring systems are commonly employed approaches for the diagnosis of BV. Despite the Nugent scoring system being the gold standard method for diagnosing BV, Amsel's criteria are generally preferred in clinical setup owing to the fact Nugent scoring requires considerable time and expert microscopist. This study was conducted to determine the diagnostic value of Amsel's criteria by comparing it with the Nugent scoring system.

methodsThis was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted at Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Nepal from October 2016 to September 2017. Vaginal specimens were collected from a total of 141 women presenting with abnormal vaginal discharge. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of Amsel's criteria were calculated, and each component of Amsel's criteria was compared to the Nugent scoring system.

resultsThe sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of Amsel's criteria were 50%, 98.2%, 87.5%, and 88.8% respectively. The clue cells showed 100% specificity and vaginal discharge with pH > 4.5 had 89.3% sensitivity while compared with Nugent's scoring system.

conclusionsAmsel's criteria can be used as an adjunct method to Nugent scoring for the diagnosis of BV in the hands of skilled manpower in resources limited countries. The presence of clue cell and positive whiff test of Amsel's criteria shows good match with Nugent's score.

Indexed as

Vaginosis, BacterialAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansNepalSensitivity and SpecificityTertiary Care CentersAmsel’s criteriaBacterial vaginosisNugent scoringVaginal discharge

Identifiers

PMID34404367
PMCPMC8369704
OpenAlexW3193843517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.