ArticlePublic health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)
Using Public Health Surveillance Data to Determine Hepatitis C Virus Exposure Among Live-Born Infants in Tennessee, 2013-2017.
Article in Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Call to Pediatricians: How Can We Improve HCV Testing in Perinatally Exposed Infants?Pediatrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveMaternal hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection reported on birth certificates has been shown to underestimate HCV infection. We sought to determine the usefulness of HCV surveillance data for (1) quantifying the number of HCV-positive reproductive-aged women with a live birth, (2) comparing maternal HCV surveillance data with reported HCV infection status on birth certificates, and (3) delineating past versus current maternal infection to identify true perinatal exposures.
methodsWe extracted data from January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2017, on birth certificate indication of HCV exposure from the Tennessee Birth Statistical File, and we ascertained indication of HCV exposure by using laboratory data from the Tennessee National Electronic Disease Surveillance System (NEDSS) Base System (NBS). We conducted a sensitivity analysis comparing birth certificate indication of HCV exposure with HCV laboratory data to determine whether true perinatal exposure had occurred.
resultsDuring the study period, 6731 mothers with live births in Tennessee reported having HCV infection during pregnancy: 3295 (49.0%) had both laboratory and birth certificate indication of HCV infection, 2130 (31.6%) had indication of HCV infection on the laboratory report only, and 1306 (19.4%) had indication of HCV infection on the birth certificate only.
conclusionsUsing data from a public health HCV surveillance system with birth certificate data may improve the identification of HCV-infected pregnant women and perinatally exposed infants. Surveillance systems that include complete reporting of all HCV RNA results can be used to distinguish past from present maternal HCV infection to focus limited public health resources on currently infected mothers and their exposed infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.